Member Info for Phantom25

If this continues the other MMs will eventually get low on stock

Stifel are hidden, not advertising margin. They obviously have agreements with brokers and paying over the bid, higher than all the other MMs

Stifel back again will buy 100,000 for 92.8

Darren a director would probably use company broker, plus Stifel are a US company

Probably this bunch

https://www.stifel.com/institutional/investment-banking#product_coverage

Probably this bunch
https://www.stifel.com/institutional/investment-banking#product_coverage

Yes STFL are back on it will take 250,000 at 93.1

Fevertree it's probably another big US II

It's Called L2Dealer

Anyone can get it from IG, gives you DMA access to trade at auction. Can't remember if i had to do an online test to make sure i am experienced enough. you are under obligation not to abuse the system

Divers. definitely backs up your theory of order being filled

I have a 'Pro' L2 platform with IG , when i request a trade i get to see all the MMs offering and I can choose who to trade with

What is interesting is that the MM that will buy anything offered, is a 10th MM(stfl) who is not listed on the market. Never noticed that before

Agree. Dummy sell 100000 93.1
dummy buy 50000 97.5

Tom. One point you are probably not aware of is the margin on the cassettes, they cost about £10 to produce and will sell for circa £150. Now imagine 1000 machines worldwide running say 6 samples per day, work it out.

Researcher. My average about 54. I have found it difficult not to break my own rules and buy a lot more, but I have no income other than my investments. So have to be strict when considering risk. One thing for sure I will buy more after FDA

All over the place from 38 to 102. I got in before first try at FDA under 510K application, remember AN saying FDA should take about 6 months. Unfortunately FDA rejected 510k submission on grounds of there being no comparable device already approved. So had to go the long route

Tom I've been here for 7 years, that's why I get annoyed at *****s like FT who spout garbage about the company

Don't be fooled Tom. He has history, claiming AN was putting the FDA in jeopardy by releasing study RNSs after submission. Nothing more than a scare tactic

Arm was founded in 1990 and made billions, it was bought when it was 30 years old. That's hardly a 'snapped up' scenario. You talk rubbish

I have nothing against the odd reference to another share, but every post by fevertree this morning has carried a negative undertone in a string of B******T