Member Info for Pecten11

Hey Onaplate, just spotted one of our many previous financial experts, Mr8008 over on the KOD board
The quality of the analysis hasn't changed

Reg, what have you ever contributed to raise this 'horrendous' standard?

'? I suggest a refocus would be of benefit'
Refocusing on VAST may lead to benefits being applied for.......

Nova, there may be some holes in that string you're holding - not in this weather

The good - grade improvement was badly needed and 24% concentrate is much better
The bad - still needs to he a but higher - early predictions were based on 26-28%

The good - overall production up, direction of travel is positive
The bad - the speed of that change still needs to be faster

The VAST - still treats potential investors like passers-by at a double glazing stand - baffle with different typee of figures and ignore certain elements (like inventory on hand end Q3)
Stick to the same formats for reporting and stick a bl00dy $$$$$$ value on it

Onaplate - damascene, nice, how very biblical of you

Think many people have cried out to God in relation to AP, sadly not from orgasmic happiness, more in the disappointed premature kind of way......

Lots of assumptions , but if we balance gold and silver credits against Mercuria's margin (impossible to know for certain), then at 20% grade about $1600 / ton or 30% would be around $2400/tonne.
Shows why the new concentrator spirals / better section of ore body etc would be very important after recent grades being lower than expected

Plus board and management costs rose in the last financial year by around 27%

Sandy, must admit cant remember the Dubai connection, but was surprised to see in the accounts of costs around $410,000 re CAMM that we hadnt been told about - setting up the UK registered company wouldn't have cost that much

Sandy, whilst your around - from memory I thought AP/VAST had said that the entry into TJK via CAMM had incurred negligible costs - is that right?

InvestingGenius (cough, cough) "how oversold we are as well"

The RSI doesnt account for the 164,000,000 million shares admitted at this price recently - and volume since hasn't been great to churn that volume, so using that as a technical indicator could be misguided

InvestingGenius (cough, cough) "The debt terms can be restructured in 6 months"

The debt terms MIGHT get restructured in 6 months time - there is no guarantee
If BP is worth as much as you hope, then why wouldn't the holder of the security of BP just say no, then they acquire the rights to the asset - bargain

InvestingGenius (cough, cough) "The debt terms can be restructured in 6 months"

The debt terms MIGHT get restructured in 6 months time - there is no guarantee
If BP is worth as much as you hope, then why wouldn't the holder of the security of BP just say no, then they acquire the rights to the asset - bargain

Maxcady, tbf, they havent committed to buying an XRF - just told us all that it would make the plant more efficient (Manaila too), but obviously the improvement can only be marginal degrees, otherwise it would be a first priority

Old news via companies house

IG, he has pinned his name to the company at a higher price, but like most has had to average down with part 165,000,000 placing shares
Yet another VAST shareholder diluted

He had to buy more in the placing to average down

Nom, just got to keep reporting him/her/it

Sadly shows the admin are ineffective against VPN hiding bots

Edd, you've previously claimed to be very experienced re the market, but still like to suggest some sort of conspiracy against VAST? Bizarre

Two suggestions re 'Buys massively outweigh the sells' - either dont take the indicated buy/sell literally as it depends on the spread at the time, so is never ever accurate.
Secondly, if if 'Buys massively outweigh the sells' was factually correct, then logic would suggest a large sell order in the background
Perhaps in reality, it's more simple - that the volume of actual sells is actually greater than the volume of actual buys

I know that doesnt suit your agenda but is far more likely than mysterious market maker manipulation that you see anyone in a loss making position spouting to justify their poor judgement

IG dont forget the topco costs, insurance, listing fees, auditor costs and oh yes, the now ever higher Bod salary costs - $931,000 per year - around 27-28% higher than last year

Sandy, didn't say I neccessarily agreed with IG, just that he was more realistic than IQ15.7

While on that subject, reading your analysis in comparison to his, I think it's obvious who is more likely to be in the 99th percentile.......