Member Info for Pecten11

Sorry, that should say SCC

Bedex, as a long shot, I tried contacting the SEC in Stockholm, but due to confidentiality they were neither able to confirm or deny that any request had been forwarded to them

With all due respect - which is not a lot based on that post, rubbish

We know this is a one off process, we know it has ministerial approval, we know we need three final signatures.

If you've ever had to deal with governmental departments, their priorities are differently the private sector, it's one of the reasons why nationalisation sounds good on paper, but never really works

Chill or sell, your choice

Looks like we're gonna have an attack of comedians this afternoon.

Who wants to start a cliche count?

Neil22, hope that 'last post' is a promise.

Judging by your posting history of excellent (lol) investment decisions , we can do without your guidance..

Had any more tips from TW recently??

Apologies if already posted
https://seekingalpha.com/news/3389345-exxon-preparing-500m-upgrade-u-k-s-largest-oil-refinery

Interesting reading imo. All,part of the investment decision

http://wiki.aapg.org/Risk:_expected_value_and_chance_of_success

I know we're feeling a little frustrated but when you look at the low volumes, here and AIM in general, together with the roughly 25% drop in the mining sector in the last six months, we've held up very well.

Bring back some volume and well blow past the technical resistance.

The downside about AP answering all the Q&A ( and I mean that, cos around half if the questions were mine) is that some traders think it's worth taking the gamble against the ANRM date. It's their gamble, but if it does come early, then what margin trade again they've made is gonna be lost against the SP rise imo.

Going back to the Q&A, we should feel reassured that the questions were answered, not evaded, not ignored. Compare that with so much of AIM where investment decisions are made based on often very sketchy 'join the dots'

Tsbs, personally, it's for those improved COS figures that I believe is why the majors have signed the NDA's.
I actually think each individual Taribani well is never going to be super prolific, but and it's a very big but (think J.Lo!!l , if you could invest money, with a high chance of not only covering your money but getting a good solid rate of return over a number of years, then even big oil can be interested.

I'd actually add a 4th COS risk factor, particularly with respect to Dulwichman, and that's political. That's been a rocky road over the years but helps to explain the Atlantic Council, Ted Poe etc and bringing Georgia closer to Europe and NATO.

Simply, it why, overall, we are in a better position now than before which makes interest from the mqjits make sense.

Playing Devils advocate Tsbs, the '90% chance of success' could have been in relation to geologic success (and that has been validated) or technical success ( always problematic due to age of well bore) rather than purely a commercial success.
A lot of o&g companies will look at these parameters and sometimes quote an overall figure.

For example, a new Taribani well would have a very high geologic COS ( because of the knowledge of how the seismic has been confirmed by the wells), the technical COS would now be higher ( improved drilling practises by EDI) but there is always an commercial COS risk - until you drill the hole and test it, you can never be sure if what's underground and how it may behave.

Playing silly buggers with the spread.

More fool you if you succumb

Good find Krazy - don't ya just love the individual touches that tyecreporter added to the cut and paste lol

Sorry MadP, disagree again.
One the results won't show revenues from T39, though there may be a post period statement giving more detail.
Two, the current flow rates are only a very small part of the picture, the majors will be far more interested in how the reservoir performs and responds and what, if any read through that gives them about the rest of Taribani

Coggy, try using this - https://www.hyperdrug.co.uk/Barrier-Livestock-Louse-Powder/productinfo/LOUSELIV/

MadP, personally I disagree 're the CPR. Yes the majors have their own teams for doing probabilistic analysis, but any investment would only be sanctioned with a new CPR that includes the EldariB.

Could it he that the 'trader' is trying to play with the technical and trying to get a finish below the 200 ma?

We had Churchillian references yesterday and now Coggy is invoking Napolean!

Imho that single word post should get the most thumbs up of the day

Yeah - now that has made my day.

You had a few peeps worried Code - good to know you're still with us

Spot on Tsbs. If he comes on saying he's waiting till the SP gets back to his average, then that's as transparent as it is illogical based on his lack of trust in the company and NOMAD.