Member Info for Pecten11

Neil, I wonder why you are held in pretty universal contempt on every bb you post on??

Try making a useful contribution, even if it's negative but based on actual information ,rather than pointlessly whining on and on

Two massive pizzas, with many slices.
One with sweetcorn and green peppers, the other yellow peppers and pepperoni.

The toppings were a code

Coggy, it's surprised to be the benefit of age and wisdom - like great sculpture and painting, that you can appreciate beauty but not have to touch it.

Total rollocks imo

Sounds good - where's this doctor and can he write me a prescription??

Coggy, do you think she would have still been interested if it had been RB65?

Tattie, thanks but i know that, was after industry insight

What I was asking was whether anything else could have been inferred from the three different flow/choke rates quoted?

Tattie, I believe you've previously said you work UK offshore.

Could you help me - what extra info, based on your experience, did you infer from the 19th July RNS

'On 4 July 2018, Extended Well Testing ("EWT") commenced at T-39 well, by perforation of 21m interval of Zone 19, situated between 2970m and 3000m. After a well clean out, the well started to flow light ( 41.5 API), sweet crude oil together with wet gas and, under natural flow, achieved following production rates: 529 bbls/d of oil and 600,000 scf/d of gas using an 8/64" chock size, 347 bbls/d of oil and 425,000 scf/d of gas using an 7/64" chock size and 250 bbls/d of oil and 350,000 scf/d of gas through 6/64" chock, demonstrating excellent well deliverability. The Company anticipates that production rates from future development wells may be significantly higher.'

Bell, I see your point, but the RNS did take about data 'sharing.

Also, if the interpretation done by the major suggests more oil/greater productivity that would need to be shared in a JV scenario as it would likely affect well design and possibly increased surface facilities

It might be jam today, but am willing to wait for taste of sweet honey...............fnaar, fnaar!

From listening to pyro's recording, it sounding to me that one of the majors (who have the resources and IT/modelling ) have done an internal volumetric analysis based on our VAST amount of historic data - and from what Zaza says, are more than happy with the outcome.
But, an independently verified CPR, no

Zib, think after what sounds like a biatch of a return trip, even Mole is allowed a typo, even if it is a pretty big one!!

Thanks, ODR, bigdouble, pyro amongst others for your take on the meeting

An offtske agreement is good news but the 1000 cubic metres per day minimum doesn't exactly set a high bar to understand the possible value this translates to.
I know BLOE currently produce about 20hopd before the work over camping , does anyone know what the current gas volumes are?

Fg - seriously lol

Symore - double digits - I'll give you two fingers

Sounds like a good name for a beer - Freeatlast's Morning Glory

Tsbs, subedtly is wasted 😅

Or Putin's boys have been there with the Novichok for us having the temerity to invest in Georgia

Blindfolded and GHB, maybe we are being f&*#ed over after all !!

Or being dosed up with GHB, so they cant remember what happened

Just gotta hope that all the attendees aren't made to sign an NDA before getting into the room !!