Member Info for Pecten11

Reported- possibly the single most reprehensible post ever witnessed on this platform - and that's saying something.

May you reap what you so2 over the festive period

You really do have a high opinion of yourself teacake !

So anybody that disagrees with your point of view needs to get 'over it' . Hmmm, let us all how down to the brother's advocate, who holds no shares of his own

Whilst I'm at it, you falsely claimed I'd labelled you as a ' deramper ' on Wednesday. Please provide evidence or apologise for your inaccuracy.
I had suggested it appeared you had an agenda, as you were trying painfully hard to discuss a situation that you, nor I have enough detail to currently analyse, but asked you twice to revisit the topic when we could all discuss the pros and cons based on an actual proposal or resolution.
Now you are trying to hint at something else of your imaginings, hoping for a bite. Shame on you.

I wonder which parts of my post you'll actually reply to :)

Teacake, the fact is you choose not to answer simple questions in a simple way, because you do not have any facts regarding what value of shares/options may be proposed in return for APs legacy interest in some of the assets he has brought with him to VAST.
We shareholders (including your brother apparently, but maybe not yourself (?)) will get a chance to evaluate that proposal when it is put forward, not some extraploated argument, it is like you are debating the specifics of a trade deal with the EU, before the withdrawal agreement is even voted on

Thanks Mustang, something factual to talk about!

Does anyone know who the drilling contractor is?
Looks like the rig is a Hanjin http://www.hanjindrilling.eu/En/00_Main/Main.html

Petch - ' looks bad and most likely is.

That’s the reality stay in the present with the facts at all times'

How do you reconcile your desire for facts with stating a personal opinion -do try to be consistent

Teacup, are you a civil servant or a politician? They like debating points about something that hasn't yet happened with no factual detail to support them.

As I said earlier, by all means revert to this point when we can all debate the actual detail in any proposal when it is released, but until then all you are doing is creating more hot air than global warming

Teacup, simple question, do you have any actual information regarding a proposal to convert APs minority share of some of VASTs assets into shares/options and in what timeframe?

So Teacup, you accept that you're currently trying to debate an issue on which we don't have specific detail?

By all means return to, when we can all have a rational debate around the facts, but at the moment, its like how long is a piece of string.

Teacup- ' that's not what is being proposed' . Specifically what actually is being proposed?

AP has brought some of the assets with him, so if he is going to cede his interest in them to VAST, he should get some accommodation, but as yet, we don't know what is being proposed.
In future, we all may well want to discuss whether the proposal offers fair value, but at the moment you are trying too hard, imo, to put the cart before the horse

Well spotted in advance Eyeguy- very interesting that the shares were taken up by existing holders.

No cash, so can't take a position, but will be watching to see what happens

Ok, thanks. Just waiting on the standard notification as confirmation

Eyeguy, there's nowt wrong with positivity but have you got a link that confirms MYN have sold all their shares please?

BTW, the Exxon news relates to diffrent blocks of Georgia , nothing to do with with Block. Still good news, but only in a very general o&g prospectivity way

Gkp, good idea - use a dictionary while you're at it, so you don't 'accidentally' misunderstand what the words in an RNS actually mean

No you don't, as FRR is purely AIM listed

Apologies if already posted
https://www.oilandgasinvestor.com/ge-accelerates-baker-hughes-exit-plan-stake-sale-1722296

Mole, I posted something similar to your paragraph ' Its hard to reconcile a decision to forego revenue and run up cost other than the NDA is for real and they have a plan to manage the short term liabilities. ' a few weeks back, that either the current test flows are generating enough revenue to keep the wolf from the door and/or we are being compensated for the extra testing time, otherwise I think Zaza would have had to make the pragmatic decision to add Zone9 to boost the cash flow.
It's one of the big reasons imo, why the technical discussions and analysis must be very advanced and hopefully were at the horse trading phase

Bernadotte, that's right but the split only applies after FRR have recovered the cost pool based on what they have invested in Block 12 . That is currently between $400M and $500M (probably currently around $460M)

Am not a believer FAHP but if one did land, at least it shouldn't be for warrants at this price !!

Was just a 3k top up with AJ Bell - cheap platform but can be tricky getting a price at times

Can only get NT at the mo