Member Info for Pecten11

Rob (you know what coming)

Why did you post yesterday 'The bridge will be completed ahead of time, expected Thursday', but now say Monday??

Which one was wrong?

The one that suggested you had inside information perhaps?

ACBoom, it would be an assumption either way.
Will only know for sure when the half year results are published (or prior RNS)

DanielPiggot 'Also if Trice sold would he not be required to TR1 also as when I last looked his holding was around 8% ?'

I hope this isn't the quality of all your research??

Gregpeck- think you'll find its leased, not owned

Chris you mean that the first 233 million shares are admitted today and you want to be positive to give recipients the best chance to flip em at a profit?

Chris, so you don't believe the content of your own posts?? Should anyone else??

Sparster the placing was at .15, so the 'fortunate' recipients are likely still making an easy 10%plus flipping them into the market

Still havent had anyone suggest a good reason why the shares are being admitted in two tranches?

Only thing I can think of is the first tranche helped someone close out a short CFD?

You believing Twitter to still be the new gospel Chris?

Their 'truth' didn't quite come to pass a couple of weeks ago did it?

And release all company information via an accountable RNS (youve raised enough money to pay for them) rather than hinted at in an interview, or via a lackey to try and drive volume to get the placees out with a quick flip profit

So AP could have justifiably used the Craig Covid excuse but though he'd bull$$it some other excuses at the same time?

Pick a story AP, preferably a 100% true one and stick to it - you might remove this fog of doubt you create every time you speak

And Rob, iirc AP suggested one of the reasons for the placing was to cover a 'lost' two months worth of production and sales - so was that a porky or has the bridge been an issue for longer than we've been told?

Rob - so VAST thought it appropriate to RNS that the bridge would be fixed by the 18th, but you have inside information that this will be complete ahead of time??

Who is your source?

Chris, I'll give it to you - you don't stop trying to find new straws to clutch at lol

Baits - some people are completely blind in their reading
If you want to reference my posts then try reading them properly - I said tranche 1 was for paying down existing debt and development capital (if you don't realise what that means thats your problem)

Baits, you are the only one going on about the further tranches of the Atlas bond.
VAST have only announced the draw down of tranche 1 which was for use in Romania - paying down of previous debt and development capital. It is the interest on that tranche that I believe VAST have so far paid 6 amounts in new shares (not cash)

Fantasy - thanks for that, didn't really want my ID linked to that preposterous parallel !!

Baits, please read properly
A rising SP doesn't give a company any more cash than a falling one, but a placing into a rising SP is easier to sell and less likely to reverse the trajectory, so yes, Tesla did a placing because they needed more cash.
That's what I said in the previous post
Apart from Grinding Solutiins taking, longer than was planned, what Covid related delays /costs have VAST told us about??
Is there something they didn't inform the market about?
Or are you just giving them a generic excuse?

Johnpwh - I largely agree with you.
So Beverly admitted they havent yet completed the technical review and said Lancaster/Rona Ridge appears to be even more complicated than even 'normal' fractured basement
The biggest hole for me, is them now stating that the Brynhild fault isn't sealed between Lancaster and Lincoln. I know there is relatively only a small dataset for this - but it either is, or is not - so how was this apparently misinterpreted previously?

The presentation and interpretations have been kitchen sinked imo

Nickel - what exactly do you want comeback on??

Might have missed your point in the deluge of posts yesterday