Member Info for pebsi

DP64 - Posted on the main BB under the 'believe' thread.

I've apologised to XXXX

Top and bottom lines are me

The Important stuff:

As you will note, our share price has been volatile, both accretive and with lower pricing … all with volumes over the last few weeks

Our main focus is for the filing of the new P140 patent, as discussed in interviews and statements

Followed by partnering deals this year

We hope to update the market soon

Sorry I messed up

Thanks Super,

I sent XXXX a 'thank you post' and told her I'd posted the response here.

Probably should have blanked her name. It was a good response albeit what we already knew in truth.

OM - none of this is personal.

I wish I was new to UFO - just sharing 'knowledge'

Thanks for the post - I have a few quid in here and not deramping.

You win I win

GL mate

Love this one:-

"Hanc0ck big deal can drop any moment"

Hanc0ck big deal can drop any decade - Needs young guns to monterize? All the pieces are there.

Christmas is coming shortly and will be on us all before we know. That's all the current BOD's is focussed on.

Ask me how I know!

Lord - can you see this post?

Let me know

Thanks

Anyone?

Been deleted - no foul language.

I'll resend

PP - have you seen my posts?

Thanks

Orangemoon - wouldn't want to be out of this at the weekend LOL

UFO's BOD's doing owt yet?

Nap - Is that tongue in check?

Got £1000 in my Personal ISA and £1000 in my SIPP. Both bought at a similar price of selling 10,000,000 shares into's Fridays rise.

Can't trade the personal ISA as expressed yesterday (That was the plan - let you lot pump it up and let UFO's ineptitude drag it back down). Couldn't sell £1000 for £90 profit. True story.

I couldn't be more transparent if I wanted to be.

Weekend soon - wouldn't want to be out of this stock - classic.

Get it up to 0.15p again for my £90 x2

Where's all the useful rampers from last Friday gone?

My response from IMM has gone also? And the response to my response if that makes sense.

Based on the last few years it could be sub 0.1p??

Apparently all 0.14p's are running out? They're all 0.13p now.

People have locked themselves out this morning? Locked themselves out of buying UFO shares? Plenty still available. Easier to buy then sell - only my research in the last 10 minutes.

BS followed by BS?

Carry on investors

Any of the charts factored in UFO's BOD's doing anything for SH value?

I'm guessing they are just a prediction of UFO's BOD's doing nothing but based over the years they'll be another spike?

Do the charts have a 'JV Hanc0ck' clause?

AIM BS? Don't curse me LOL. I'm one of the chosen ones that has kept this company afloat.

Bless me? - only own a grands worth (can't sell them as NT!) now so don't care LOL. Don't curse me though. The bones of UFO are lining up.

0.2p to 0.3p next week - B_positive said it not me.

B_Positive,

Sold into the rise all my SIPP holding - 10 million shares. Had to sell into a rise as as I've said today I can't even sell £1000's worth

What's your point? I'm laying it out there yet you're trying to trip me up. My messages are there for all to see.

as it's a bit queiter today...

4-5 years ago i would have dso'd han****. used the profit to reinvest into eh when we still owned it.

many of you will say that costs money. 4-5 years ago if any of the placings were to develop hanc0ck then noone would be too peed off? not sure we didn't have a placing to pump eh's mine out back then? what came of that?

this bb has been split throughout regarding ag and iron ore. always been polite 'arguments' though.

Wish I was, they'd be a change of management and a monterization of assets. Too much to ask?

"argumentatively" before my grammar becomes the topic

I'm not upset by any stretch.

Just firing a few facts out there.

TBH you're the one sounding slightly desperate? 0.2p to 0.3p in a week or so?

I'm guessing you didn't sell into the rise Friday?

Not a problem - It'll get there we hope. Just less of the BS.

Nappyman will be in shortly to back you up. None of this is ment argumentively and your responce echoed that.

GL