Member Info for pb940

Agreed knuttie, I stayed off the bb last night so it didn't turn into one of those threads that dominated the board.

Knuttie, PE of 10? Incoming :)

Or you could do it this way

https://www.investopedia.com/ask/answers/070314/how-do-i-calculate-pe-ratio-company.asp

Oh, his post has gone anyway.

Interesting thing about the internet, you'll all be surprised be this I know, but you can normally find whatever you want online to suit your own agenda. Mine is a positive agenda for the advancement of Bushveld Mineral/Energy etc, in turn helping improve the African continents energy security and also my bank balance.

Presumably the other type of agenda has a website with 3.3 out there as well.

P/E 23.6
Reuters 34.7
Bloomberg 9.61

And I seem to be doing rather well in BMN (only 500% + up) rather than the post office, thanks for your concern.

https://simplywall.st/stocks/ca/materials/tsx-lgo/largo-resources-shares/news/is-largo-resources-ltd-tselgo-attractive-at-this-pe-ratio/

According to this the PE for largo is 23.6

I'm being offered 27.65 to sell

And the names 940, pb940

Yep

That's because the estimate on when the update should be released is from private investors based on previously released updates rather than having a firm date given for when the update will be released by Bushveld. It's only late based on our guesses not on when BMN will release the news at which point it will have been released exactly on time.

The other point about the target is that it's seems to be based on BMN continue at the same production and with the same share of Vametco. Increasing production to 5000mtv and the potential buy-out of Sojitz would substantially change the target.

Awww, poor babies. Oh well :)

Slowly creeping up on the bid, now being offered 27.2p to sell. Even my naivety as an investor says I shouldn't sell.

No I wouldn't do that to you I'm just trying to find out where the info is that you based your argument that they are delaying due to not reaching their Q2 target. I'll have have a look through the RNS for you and report back when I find it. Must be in there somewhere for you to keep mentioning it. Also if you're going to start using profanity the argument is lost.

You the were the one that mentioned not meeting the Q2 target as a negative. I'd just like you to tell me what that target is? Not your target, the companies?

Watch him avoid the question in his response. Although now I've said he will he'll feel obligated to take a stab at something. Or ignore. Or deflect again.

lol, modus operandi confirmed :)

What is the target for Q2 nvhltd? I don't remember BMN ever saying anything. I know the bb has estimated what we think is possible but we don't know the exact date/time of the increase in production. And I know we've been told the capacity for a full year but that wouldn't be a full year until June 2019, so if it doesn't reach a target it's a target set here not by BMN.

The problem is zitty his modus operandi will be to bring up a point (negative usually) and then bang the drum about it continually, he'll ignore any responses completely or using semantics to disregard them. In the past he's also continued asking a question on the bb insinuating a negative slant when he had already received a response from Mikhail clarifying his query (turned out there had been a change in strategy from small vrfb's to larger units), but he still tried using it to cause unrest on the board.

Could we eventually move more towards a Cash Whale? pb940 @ 10:56
---------------------------------
Great minds faramog,

Could we eventually move more towards a Cash Whale?