Member Info for PAYJJ

FyI, this was Feb 2020... Is the moment to sue getting closer then?

https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/norrbotten/lojligt-om-regeringen-sager-nej-till-gruva-i-kallak

- It has been incorrectly reported that we would sue the Swedish government. All alternatives are still on the table, but at today's board meeting we have decided not to sue the government at the moment, says Beowulf's CEO Kurt Budge.

I love it how he says..."at the moment" GLA

https://www.svt.se/nyheter/lokalt/norrbotten/regeringsforhandlingar-om-gruvan-i-kallak

Yes Tintin, I agree with the 4/5 bagger... But at what point does the first bag start. I'm hoping in anticipation of approval this share gloats up towards 10-16p again...then we start our bagging

Thanks FELLDOWN, beat me to it

Rossy, the shares will be allocated.to you on the 12 December which is when the funds will be taken. The actual date when you can sell them would be the 22 December.

Regarding wolf mountain...shame it will have no effect on the SP. Morny morn

Yes very good, shame it doesn't reflect our share price

Sorry to hear that Geovanni, well done on Condor Gold. Hold tight here and hopefully we will rise to a point where you can feel slightly less bitter (for search of a better word) towards this share after such a great loss. I don't think we will reach the kind of break even high your looking for but by the sounds of it you've broke even already by diversifying your portfolio. GLA

Giovanni, I'm guessing your average is 6.7p?

67p...is your break even...you must of had a mountain of shares at 70p high 10+ years ago. If you bought 77000 shares and it's only just dented your average

According to the Swedes, they have no idea either

Nick, if everything goes swimmingly from here on out, I would be hoping for 35-60p for the award of Kallak...over ambitious? GLA

Just FYI, I also use
https://www.investegate.co.uk/Index.aspx?searchtype=1&words=Bem
Very good website and always releases the RNS immediately.

RNS just landed in my inbox. Very happy with the comments from Kurt regarding the report, "forthcoming" hopefully will have some meaning now. The only thing I hold hope for is a time/date for a decision rather than "forthcoming". GLA

Eric, None taken (smiley face)

Eric,sometimes I need things done for me, that's what Ive done here for other people. If you don't want to read my translation you don't have to. You can ignore it and do it yourself later/now as can everyone else. If others are feeling a bit lazy this morning then I've done them a favour. ATB

It's a pain in the *** to translate and read so I thought I would go to the trouble.
GLA

that the case is in the meantime subject to continuous and relevant preparation
measures. In addition, as the committee has previously emphasized, the procedure requires
of complex administrative matters an efficient and effective organization.
In the present case, no visible administrative measures were taken during one
5 period of almost three years. According to the committee, this means an extension of time that does not
is acceptable.
The material also shows that the applicant applied on several occasions
contact with the Ministry of Trade and Industry with a request to develop their case
at a meeting, but that the ministry has then stated that a meeting is not possible
10 because the question concerns a forthcoming government decision and a matter under
processing. The committee can state that the Prime Minister during the hearing in
another review matter (section 3.4) to the committee stated that as a party
have the opportunity to present their opinion orally, so that everyone will
treated equally. The committee can state that the ministry management's message to
15 representatives of the company in question on the issue of the possibilities for a meeting
thus does not appear to be in line with the approach taken by the Prime Minister
indicates and that there thus seems to be a lack of a common approach within
The Government Offices to the possibility for parties in administrative matters to obtain
hold a meeting with the responsible ministry.
END

Of the email signature on the document
it appeared that the sender represented the company Beowulf Mining plc
The company is not a party to the case. The assessment was therefore made first that it was
it was obvious that the document had little significance for the ministry's activities.
The changed assessment was due to the fact that in November 2019
It was agreed that the sender of the e-mail is also a signatory for the applicant
Jokkmokk Iron Mines AB. Against this background, the document was registered in it
20 ongoing case of processing concession.
Finally, it is stated that in addition to the principles provided by the Public Administration Act
expression - that a case should be handled so simply, quickly and costly
as efficiently as possible without compromising legal certainty - in the Ministry of Trade
there is no specific objective in terms of processing time
25 for the type of case in question. The measures that have been taken to
meet the requirement for expeditious and legally secure processing includes that
another administrator was hired in June 2018 at the unit responsible for
i.a. administrative matters relating to mineral issues to strengthen the unit.
The Ministry of Trade and Industry also regularly monitors the number of open cases
30 with special focus on older cases. Within the ministry is also held
regular training for employees in e.g. case management and
requirements of the Administrative Procedure Act.
The committee's position
The Committee has on several previous occasions emphasized the importance of
In administrative matters is not delayed unnecessarily. Long processing
times pose risks to legal certainty and mean that individuals may be affected
both financial and personal losses.
When the government handles and decides on administrative matters, it is central
that administrative law principles are upheld. Although the matter is
40 objects for the committee's review appear to be both extensive and complex,
which of course can justify a longer processing time than in more routine ones
matters, in the Committee's view, the length of time must be required