RE: Lock in5 Aug 2018 20:37
Why's it amazing that the initial shares were subdivisions at 0.1p? Hows that different to any other starts ups nascent beginnings?
Seems bog standard development of a listed entity to me, the founders always get silly cheap then the seed investors get their cut then its those involved in the float and lastly stockmarket participants get their chance after the co. has reached a state where its a viable contender for the market (and in this case the main LSE not AIM.)
Does seem theres a lot of negativity being whipped up on this one. Maybe as we all think it'll do a Tern once the placing shenanigans are over?