RE: SDXs LMS2 well – Flow test Q4 20215 Sep 2021 09:59
I do indeed unreseverdly apologise.
I'm like Meg Ryan in the movie with Tom hanks, "You've got mail".
"I don't know why it happens, I think it, then it just comes out, and I instantly regret it"
I was even afraid of logging on and reading the replies for fear of the abuse that awaited me. How messed up is that????
In fact I'd be happy if we could just put it down to some kind of childhood trauma and move on.
GRH, as far as my lack of positive contribution is concerned, that's easy, I don't have anything to add!
Certainly nothing to match the contributions by all the amazing posters already here.
Whilst we're sharing. After some very heavy averaging down of recent weeks I've managed to find myself way way way too deeply invested into this Company, resulting in an almost daily obsession as regards to the future possibilities of success that consume my almost every waking hour, and still I have nothing to contribute that I feel to be worthy of comparison with the majority of posts here. Secondly, I suspect like many here I rely on third parties to point me in the direction of information and research that tends to help with the conviction that my original investment was the correct one.
So that's why I'm here, and before anyone pipes up with the ol' chestnut regarding DYOR, no, I'm not investing because of something someone said on a bulletin board! Yawwwn! I'm a grown up and make my own decisions. (You see, there I go again, sorry)
Anyhow to the main point of contention. When I'm reading obviously well researched posts by people I have much respect for, or at least as much respect as an anonymous BB allows, I get so disappointed by such crass errors in language that it leaves me questioning the intelligence, veracity and accuracy of said posts. Which in turn devalues and discredits, in my view, an otherwise hitherto fantastic contribution.
All this btw from a 1970s failed social experiment in State schooled Secondary Eduction. So in turn I consider myself a seriously low bar and therefor not too much to ask for, shirley?
PB xx