Member Info for PartyPooper

16p by 11

II's lol, what a couple of Russians behind some front

The death cult continues to react in predictable fashion

I've learnt on here in the last 4 weeks that those you think know a lot don't know enough and that this BB is a bit like a death cult.
This is crashing

I was told earlier there is a photo of him at MT holding up a massive bag of Rhodium, which I took with a saxa 5kg bag of salt. No doubt about the Rh is the consensus on here I thought.

OK Sauce?

Looks like it's going to open much lower and slide backwards to me.

I invested because I believed the BOD were motivated to sell and this would happen in a short time frame, EUA is tiny, it will be gobbled whole IMO and before December.

Just had a look, I get a few mentions and he's still saying how all the money is PI's no II's, no TR1 etc.

MrWD40 seems to be the new up-and-coming RNSMAN, WD40 is full of conspiracies about the II, why the Nomad resigned in the first place and keeps banging on about how there are no institutional investors named, all the money is from PI's.

Would a partial sale of our 80% holding in MT to a partner who could move things forward there be on the cards?

Calamari
You started out claiming that because DS was now an M&A that he would would only be dealing with an incoming acquisition or a merger, that notion is plainly ridiculous, the title means nothing.
The issue of whether or not we are sold or merged is a separate issue, you're moving the goal-posts as to the reasons you think it's a merger to cover over your initial bunkum.
I've already said how I think this will involve multiple parties, after all, we can't sell 100% of these mines because we don't own any of them 100%.
I think which ever way it shakes out it will end up around 80p takeaway.

spoon My expectations are along the same lines as yours, 40p to 80p, can't see how it would get beyond that. These Pampers have pushed shares before with the same conviction that tanked. They are dangerous, try to control the BB telling others to filter the naysayers like some cult censorship.

Reason Not Sloth Makes A Naysayer
GLA

Got a squid arguing with a lobster, all at sea

Currently going with the flow of mac who is agreeing with me that the M&A title does not take possibility of a sale of the table.

Yep, it's just a general title.

Depends on who that II was.

Why take my word for it though:
"James Nieuwenhuys, Eurasia's CEO and Executive Director: "In my new capacity as CEO and Executive Director I will continue to work with our advisers on the SALE process of the Company"

Reason Not Sloth Make A Naysayer

"In the context of EUA doing M&A, the "A" would mean Eurasia buying another company, not the other way round."
Tell that to all the M&A companies that advertise themselves as the experts to sell your company lol

The SP has risen because of the promise of an impending sale not based on the increase in resources, that makes this an incredibly risky investment. No sale and this plummets.