RE: Government reassurance29 May 2019 22:31
Santiago Yépez: "Mining control must improve"
Interview with Santiago Yépez, president of the Mining Chamber of Ecuador.
ROBERTO AGUILAR / QUITO / MAY 29 2019 / 00:01
Santiago Yépez, president of the Mining Chamber of Ecuador.
Santiago Yépez, president of the Mining Chamber of Ecuador. (Ángelo Chamba / Expreso)
- The Giron consultation, in which it was decided to stop the mining activity in Kimsacocha, triggered the alarms in the mining sector. However, the Government has sent several reassuring messages to you. Do you feel supported?
- We feel now supported. We do not feel calm yet. What the president said in the message to the Nation has been quite clear: he has asked the Constitutional Court to be consistent and consistent. Regarding the popular consultation carried out in the canton of Girón, it is worth indicating that the Constitutional Court did not rule on the merits of the consultation, that is: if carrying out local popular consultations on issues of national interest, it is unconstitutional . We believe that communities should manifest themselves in the forms prescribed in the Constitution and the law, that is: when there are ancestral communities, through prior consultation ; and if not, in the processes of dissemination and social participation in the procedures for the approval of environmental licenses.
- What is your next step? Are you going to file an appeal with the Constitutional Court?
- On Monday, the Constitutional Court has heard of a new request for consultation in the provinces of Imbabura and Carchi, in the Lita area. They have 20 days to rule on whether the question is constitutional or not. In some way this may open up the possibility that the Court will finally determine that it is not possible to carry out local consultations on matters of national interest, especially if they are restrictive of the central Government .
- But the Constitution does empower local governments to make popular consultations.
- On subjects of its competence. Not in mining issues, which are restrictive competition from the central government.
- But what if they are raised as environmental issues? The care of páramos and water sources, which is how the query is being proposed in the Azuay, is it not a competence of the local governments?
- I disagree. In any case, if you are going to be the authorities of the province of Azuay who execute the decision in the referendum, they should also be the ones who, by right of repetition, have to cover those securities that have already invested in mining projects and those who will stop receiving Ecuador .
- Does this principle of repetition not apply to the government authorities that authorized mining concessions without complying with environmental standards, as determined by the Comptroller's reports for the case of Kimsacocha and others?
- That is a subject that does not correspond to the mining sector to determine. We do not have to fall into any kind of political