Member Info for Osaka

50mt has always been the target, drilling was paused to concentrate on the EIA resubmission, it will be relatively simple to achieve this or very close to it.

BelgianBerk sharing their intimate knowledge of the markets again, what would we do without these insights.

1/ He’s only just joined as a non executive director.

2/ We have zero knowledge of a persons finances, it’s nobodies business how an individual spreads their assets.

3/ The only reason we know he’s bought is because it has to be communicated when a director buys.

4/ I’ve seen people posting on here that they hold a few hundred quids worth of shares and then start slating management, it’s pathetic, grow up.

5/ Ever thought he might have other significant investments in stocks or property, he might not, we don’t know so shut up.

6/ How many on here criticising have a spare few grand to chuck in ? Again grow up.

I think it's been obvious for a while that this TO story was false, looked like it could be legit originally but then when the SP failed to react that said it all, even the ramping baboons and traders didn't move in and try and push the narrative lol

Very happy with that, the guy knows how to generate significant profit and has the track record to prove it.

Current negotiaitions are to some extent irrelevant until the resource upgrade is completed, i'm sure there's plenty of offers and we're holding all the cards in an extended game of poker, come back and make us a proper offer when you see how much we've increased the resource attitude is in play here is my guess.

It is stated very clearly, they have the legal right to access for 30 years from 2006 but wish to compensate local land owners rather than just using the legal position to use it.

Don't start all your nonsense again, there's too many people invested here with bigger brains that will put you in your place.

Usually i'm not a fan of radio silence from the company, however right now silence is golden, I sense something huge is coming, let's see.

Https://www.iea.org/reports/critical-minerals-market-review-2023/key-market-trends?utm_content=buffercbc2d&utm_medium=social&utm_source=twitter.com&utm_campaign=buffer#abstract

You just went down another 2 feet, well done lol

Stop digging, you're making yourself look stupid.

For a start his consortium paid £2.5bn

https://www.dailymail.co.uk/sport/sportsnews/article-10793143/Chelsea-5bn-question-moguls-make-numbers-stack-up.html

"One objective price tag range for Chelsea, using a respected valuation tool known as the Markham Multivariate Model (MMM), is between £1.25bn and £1.5bn"

I understand you're clueless

Ok they are in a different league to us but look at how lithium is taking them to the next level, bodes really well for us.

https://www.afr.com/companies/mining/pilbara-s-record-lithium-profit-blew-out-office-calculator-20230825-p5dzdh

Seriously ? How the hell you can make that assumption I don't know lol

Https://www.zgr.net/en/wiki/who-is-aba-schubert-from-aethel-partners-net-worth-of-potential-chelsea-owner-its-ceo/

Let this be a lesson to you all, whatever Belgian shizzle Bert is smoking don't go down that road, drugs are bad ;-)

Another very strong signal from the board, excellent stuff.

Just what I said yesterday !!!!! No more deals giving away a slice of the company to offtake partners like the previous Galp arrangement that we thankfully cancelled. The message is clear, if you want our raw material then stump up some cash upfront, simple as that !!!!

Well played BOD

"In progressing the Project, we will also look to convert the strong commercial interest that the Project has enjoyed to date into long term relationships with specific offtake and strategic partners over the coming months. Given the strategic value to consumers of securing a long-term source of spodumene concentrate in Europe, we will be seeking relationships in which our commercial partners make a major contribution to the funding of the Project's development in return for the product they will receive."

Do you know anything about the CEO apart from his name ? Your comments couldn't be any more moronic if you tried. That claim could certainly be levelled at the previous incumbent, not this one, get your facts right.

You really haven't got a clue, the cash position is healthy, this SMALL raise is purely to pay for the DFS. The previous deal that we cancelled with Galp was an example of what we DO NOT want. Why give away a slice of the company at todays prices when this way we keep full control ? There are several very large players who want in, well they are going to have to pay the price, this send s astrong message that we no longer need to do bucket shop deals to keep the lights on, we can cherry pick future partners and on OUR terms. I suggest you either grow up or stop playing adult games, maybe scratchcards would suit you better.

What I don't understand is how some people talk down their own investment and just constantly talk bollards. I recently had a meeting with Dale representing not only myself but a wider group of investors, between us we have a very significant holding. Start communicating directly if you have any concerns, but don't ask stupid questions or expect any info that should be released by RNS. I can tell you this, we all have a fantastic chance of making huge returns here, almost totally derisked now regardless of whether or not we even mine. The interest now the DIA is sorted is immense, there's going to be a huge number of offers incoming of all flavours and I trust the new look BOD implicitly. It's been around 7 years since I first met Dale and back then it was easy to tell he's the brains behind the operation, yes he will stand aside soon once a new CEO is appointed but his contribution going forward will be no less valuable. There are no funding worries, there are people queing up to throw cash our way and it's reassuring that we haven't just grabbed the easy money, shareholder value is coming, chill your beans guys.