Scancell founder says the company is ready to commercialise novel medicines to counteract cancer. Watch the video here.
Doh!! What an absolute schoolboy error! Ha! As I have shared in TOM at £0.005 I did the same calcs for PQE in cents but just realised my error with PQE being $0.05, not $0.005! Ffs! Apologies all. I’ll leave the messages on here so I can be suitably shamed! Ha!
https://sec.report/Document/0001062993-21-000639/
This was the previous transaction when he bought 1m to take him to 1.45m shares.
What?? He owns 2.45m shares at circa 0.5/0.6c each- how is that $100k?
Morning all - am I missing something here? From what I can read of the transaction, he bought 1m shares taking his total to 2.45m shares. At circa 5c a share, thats about $12k total. Where does the $100k figure come from please orselega?
I do still come across positive articles:
https://www.proactiveinvestors.co.uk/companies/news/219286/simec-atlantis-advancing-on-three-fronts-in-renewables-sector-219286.html
Arsenal - Janus increased their holding by 0.09%. That’s 0.09% of 499m shares! That’s less than 500,000 shares bought to cross that threshold from 6.92 to 7.01%. Not really a flurry of ‘large trades’ is it. Do your calcs before spouting off. Look at the trade times and prices! The time and date stamp of the trades on that particular day when compared to the SP at that time were much nearer the bid than the ask so imo they were mostly sells (except circa 500,000). OHS
Bob - they have also written again post call-in request. The full letter was published yesterday:
https://www.walesonline.co.uk/news/wales-news/uskmouth-power-carbon-emission-newport-19863475
"We are aware that you are now in the period of determining whether to officially call in the proposal and we would like to formally request again that you do call in this proposal and then say no to the scheme"
Hi Celery - I will assume that perhaps your last post was directed at me. If so I can assure you that no games are being played here. As you know from following this bb, I was a massive advocate of SUP (more so that the tidal aspect) and absolutely sung it's praises on here for all to read. Everything I posted was my own opinion and for the majority part, backed up with sound research and attached links for reference (unlike some other posters who did the exact opposite and posted no links, just negative opinion). I weathered the highs and lows of the SP movements and traded along the way when I felt it was right. All of this is evidenced in my posts of when I sold and bought. At some point though, like with any investment, perception can change. Perception that is influenced by company actions and/or lack of action and also from keeping abreast of a multitude of research avenues and media outlets. I reiterate once again that information on this company is freely available to monitor on many public registers to better understand and be aware of what is happening in the background. In the case of the SUP project, this info and the timeline of events is there for all to see and read on these registers and I have posted these links for all to use at their will. It is always up to the individual investor to buy or sell when they feel it is right, based on their own thoughts and research. Let's be realistic here for a moment though - no one who posts on here has any affect on the SP. Absolutely no one. The mm affects the SP and that movement is either based on news, rumour or volumetric supply/demand. Research and links simply aid investors or would-be investors to buy or sell based on their thoughts from the research and links they read. Do you think it fair that an investor or would-be investor should not be made aware of some news or public register information? OHS
https://www.eenews.net/energywire/2021/02/18/stories/1063725351
"The Biden administration has announced it is appealing a federal judge's ruling requiring further government analysis of oil and gas lease sales on public lands in Utah's Uinta Basin".
Apologies, this one: https://documents.newport.gov.uk/PublicAccess_LIVE/SearchResult/RunThirdPartySearch?FileSystemId=PL&FOLDER1_REF=20/0748
Hamill23 - follow this link in answer to your question of who the 3rd party mat have been:
https://documents.newport.gov.uk/PublicAccess_LIVE/Document/ViewDocument
In answer to your question regarding delayed trades - it convinces some PIs that buys are sells and vice versa - in this case - most of the delayed trades were actually sells. This is clearly evident if you look at the SP at the time of the trade. It doesn’t take much research to hazard a decent educated guess who is in a good position to sell at this price and make a tidy profit from a recent investment.....
ST - good post - I agree with your reply. It's just whether Wales will agree to be the proof of concept guinea pig? I also don't think the fall back option carries much weight, especially given "Government plans to phase out unabated coal fired generation by 2025". OHS
https://documents.newport.gov.uk/PublicAccess_LIVE/SearchResult/RunThirdPartySearch?FileSystemId=PL&FOLDER1_REF=20/0748
First Link didn't work - the top document is the letter (12/02/2021)
This was added to the NCC planning application site on the 12/02/2021 so was obviously not common knowledge prior to the sitting but does explain the possibility of why the call-in was requested
The following link is to a letter from Friends of the Earth (FOTE) which was received by a Councillor on the 2nd Feb - the day before NCC were due to sit and discuss the planning application:
https://documents.newport.gov.uk/PublicAccess_LIVE/Document/ViewDocument
Very much worth a read as there's a few very interesting points within
dall01 - I think 4 in total for both Phases of SUP - 2 for Phase 1 and then the other 2 for Phase 2? Makes more sense to only commit to 2 plants first if only going to supply SUP
Oh, and I'm not 'back' ha! just having a nosey ;)
In short - no idea! I've done pretty well out of CLON over the years and now see a very tempting entry price once again but like before, always just a speculative position to be the 'early bird' as we know how this SP moves on very little actual substance. As attractive as the price is though, these figures concern me so I need to research a bit more or wait for an update. Their money seems very depleted form what I can read though. I also note another Parliament has come and gone without a sign of the Tano Block being ratified. The latest one (the 8th) being inaugurated in January of this year: https://www.parliament.gh/ - maybe this is the year..... :/
OHS
Oh Eric, wrong again I see. No doubt stemming from not reading things properly again? The 'some company or other' was linked in my post so anyone can follow and read up on them themselves to see what they do/plan to do. My question was not about them supplying to SUP, it was whether they will be a potential competitor to NPA in the future and as to why this 'some company or other' has not only nearly finished it's first pellet production plant but already has 7 more planned and why NPA are only planning on 2 for SUP only? On a separate note though, good to see the Tidal aspect of SAE getting some attention again, even if the news is a few weeks old (updates were regularly posted on here during transit of the turbine, installation and first generation) OHS