Member Info for oldblue1973

Wow would they off been better just going directly to them and just asking for 2-3 million????

this is getting silly if thats the case

Lol lol lol

so aag get there 7 million back theen.....safari zambia gets 1.8 million pathfinder 1.2 million???

so your getting diluted twice from the 2 legal firms?????????

Or 68% off current share price

Ok if the payout is 10 million?????

your numbers a BIT off now for starters its 40%........then thats net recoveries now if they are now talking about under 30 million and there i now 2 companies your not gonna get too much left from 10 million with legal fees for 1 year

7 million legal fees???

so 3 million left 40% gives 0.00189 per share or just under the current share price...humm not the bonanza we were told

632,494,834 that attract bonus shares on any BIT deal

just hope they dont lose the bit off a4 paper with all the names accounts and how many shares on them

Think someone might be talking out off there bottom with the 3 weeks

seems 83 days is average but more like 100 ish

https://icsid.worldbank.org/sites/default/files/parties_publications/C3765/Claimant%27s%20Response%20to%20the%20Respondent%27s%20Requests%20under%20ICSID%20Arbitration%20Rules%2028%281%29%20and%2039%281%29/Legal%20Authorities/CL-13.PDF

thats now 80 days since the 18th sept so any day now?+

thats quite along time to do this but ahh well

so they going back to the moz goverment asking for less than 30 million? whilst the BIT is still going thro?

So are they doing this with the IMM shares?

https://www.youtube.com/shorts/0c8Fy-eWQFk

In addition, and separate to the above agreed amendment, the Revised SPA prohibits AAG from assigning/transferring any of its rights under the Revised SPA. In this respect, Pathfinder and AAG now agree to amend this clause as such to allow for AAG to assign/transfer all of their interest in IM Minerals to a new third party entity, Luangwa Resources LLC ("Luangwa") and to allow for Luangwa to perform all of AAG's obligations under the Revised SPA (the "New Assignment Clause"). Notwithstanding this amendment, AAG will continue to guarantee to Pathfinder all of the future obligations of Luangwa under the Revised SPA if and when they become performable in accordance with the Revised SPA.

assign/transfer all of their interest in IM Minerals to a new third party entity

now thats the key thing transfer off rights and not playing hide the IMM shares which is what should off happened rather than playing hide the IMM shares as the rights to the claim i doubt are in the IMM shares

Https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=M6LoRZsHMSs

Now key points RNS from this

https://www.lse.co.uk/rns/PFP/amendment-to-the-revised-im-minerals-spa-z2ppi7ix2eygqgs.html

AAG have confirmed they have submitted the Claim by way of a Request for Arbitration to the International Centre for Settlement of Investment Disputes.

so the 3 weeks is that it being assessed for the validity off the claim or BIT now i now see that they are refering to the claim (BIT) and not just claim now

so its up in front off judges as we speak to be assesed to see if the BIT court will accept it ?????

me reading between lines

So last RNS 29th jan.....monday canned from monday?

so that would take 5 days to write so started 22nd or on 2nd week process?

And RNS take 2-5 days to write 3 days last week? from 31st?...humm...humm.humm

So from the CHAT board

new company 27th -26th dec

aag website down...humm they dont seem to want or cant engage the BIT so new company?

now someone was going on about jan 15th? and jan 31st?

so new guys need 2-3 weeks to check paperwork

in jan 15th goes in.....3 weeks? (guys on board or chat board?) ends 31st? or 2.5 weeks in?

so ended last friday?

maybe hear next week on its status?

lol where they getting this non RNS stuff from...ouchie..

And if you havnt been following the lng (gbs design to be used in moz) it doesnt work

https://thebarentsobserver.com/en/arctic-lng/2023/12/message-market-russian-arctic-lng-will-not-be-delivered

thats the lng design that is required for the moz project for the 1.5 billion for the BIT

humm...

So AAG website still looks mothballed

https://www.acumenadvisorygroup.com/about-1

and the aptly name safari new guys are 36 days old company wise?

humm......

The Directors recognise that the Original Deferred Consideration Clause provides limited economic exposure to AAG in the event that the Claim results in an award lower than US$30 million

err?? 1.5 billion claim and under 30 million?

and err Luangwa is basically a safari park iin zambia is someone having a laught?

And also they have split up imm and pathfinder which maybe now question the validity off the high court judgement now...again no lawyer just my interpretation off it

I still have no idea why they are transfering a vechile or legal vechile for use in mozambique...the licence was in pathfinders name and imm is just the mozambuque company required to hold the licence...the licence is in my opinion or was in the cadstre in apthfinders name last time i checked....so why they are transfering the shares for a redundant mozambuqe company is beyond me...also high court judgement is for imm and pathfinder vs veloso and co not moz gov

i see the new lawyers in manchester are doing well LEGALLY....ouch

Any your not paying them they are paying YOU or pathfinder!!! the 1 million (which more than half went to expenses)

they have probably forked out 5 million plus to try and put this in (over the year)

Err stuck in after the due dillegence? was 2 million wasnt it? now its a claim not BIT....hummm .....