Member Info for Ojay

So ist's true: You're here to wind up AND "have fun" - great!

Unfortuately I doubt anybody can take your contributions seriously if that is what your purpose on this BB is all about.

B/P: "I think at the time..."

Assuming that "thinking" could actually be one of your strengths compare that to mmafr's extremely prudent statement (5 minutes before yours): "....avoid unnecessary speculation".

b/p: Whether you like it or not - you are the most popular negative speculator on this BB. So you may want to take mmafr's proposal into consideration.

Master82: Do you see any reasons for which MB should remain CEO? Do you believe that MB still has the PM BoD's support?

And the meeting room.

B/p: Glad to oblige.

Which one?

Desperation rules!

B/p: I sincerely hope you find a way to screw you head on right - you don't seem to appreciate posters (like Pilsbury7) who sympathise with you.

Hope you recuperate quickly.

He's sure doing a great job at showing it!

Is that all you've got?

Pilsbury: It appears as if b/p doesn't like you; but won't worry it wouldn't be good if he did!

Who cares what you think?

B/p: why would you want to purchase PM shares and "fill your boots"? According to your posts PM must be one of the worst companies on AIM around!

OMG: b/p you are a wierdo.

Well then Doc83: What is the market telling you today?

Master: I agree with all your points (there may even be more!). It's a complete snafu - don't know how they want to attract additional investors if this is the way they support business - jeez!

Barclays - if I may jump in here:

If you have a contract based claim, the respective contract will determine the jurisdiction and the applicable law.

I assume there is no contractual basis and - quite frankly - even if there were Governments never agree to alien jurisdictions.

So - whichever way you look at it: PM would have to take action in Mongolia. Good luck with litigating against a Government in its own country!

Good for Matt - way to go! Hope you can keep going with that.

Matt: Better for you to keep uninvested - trust me.

WTF is b/p talking about?

Thx for confirming that you don't like my posts and that you have not filtered me (as you said you would - days ago).

BTW: Calling names doesn't really cut the cake does it?