We would love to hear your thoughts about our site and services, please take our survey here.
You are right, Git, in that trust is lacking and I'll wait until I see it before I really celebrate it - but there was no timescale implied at all (other than delivery later this year) so not sure why you would say there was.
I have no clue what their motives are. I certainly don't think they work on Helikon's behalf; that's ridiculous. My guess is that they are sad, vindictive souls who cannot cope with the fact that they have made a poor investment decision without having the guts to recognise that they invested in a high risk scenario. However, unlike a punt on, say, an oil exploration project which is often literally all or nothing this is at least still alive. As for how to deal with them, report but report factually. There's no- doubt that some points the make are valid - how can they not be when the price is down c. 80% in a couple of years? Above all, actually have ago at discussing things that are of interest.
Garonne et al. Everybody knows that :
1. The company has had several false starts in the commercialisation race
2. That management has made comments historically that have proved to he premature/overoptimistic
3. That many punters are under water after the fall in the price over the last couple of years
But for pity's sake, making the same point hour in, hour out clearly achieves nothing. I don't believe you are paid shorters, but I do believe you are complete and utter pains in the @rse who have destroyed any potential constructive use that this board could be put to. There's only two courses of action that make any sense. Re-evaluate where the company is now and either cut your losses or stick with it.