Member Info for ocelot

-- In line with our past experience, consumer demand has weakened further
since the UK General Election was called in late October;
-- In the first eight weeks of the new financial period, retail like-for-like
revenues decreased by 7.2% (2018: decrease of 1.9%);
-- A reduction in political uncertainty will be key to the short term outlook
improving.

Difficult start to the new year, politics weighing heavily on performance.
People worry about the impact on the economy of a Corbyn government, but the impact of all of these years of political uncertainty has already been very considerable.

If true, then certainly suggests vastly improved relations between the KRG and Baghdad.

Re Bilgin, all one can do is speculate, only they know the reasons underlying their increased stake.

Sounds alright to me, dsfat.

Best wishes.

Don't remember expressing myself in quite those terms, but there's nothing wrong in trying to buy in at the bottom, we are agreed on that.

Good to see, with your "realism", you maintain your interest in ANGS, HeadinThe Sand.

Surprised people don't realise that, in focusing their comments on the poster and not on the stock, they are openly conceding the weakness of their arguments.

Sconnybotland,

With the benefit of hindsight, one can certainly say it was a "strong sell" at 12p last year.

But today, at 0.775p, after a decline of 93.5%, it is, imho, very far from obvious ANGS constitutes a "strong sell".

Then you have still to see a paid ramper, jaffas.

Not convinced there will be too much of a market spike on a Conservative win.

Brexit may "get done", but the trade deal with the EU will then loom large, with its implication of a no-deal Brexit (unless Johnson breaks his word, of course).

This board contains both positive and negative posters on ANGS.

Amongst those who are negative, suspect there are some who are waiting for a clear sign that the share price has bottomed before buying in.

Thought my posts were about ANGS, HeadinTheSand, but stand corrected by your good self.

Glad to see your "realism" has brought you back to posting on ANGS without too much of a delay.

wealdpwr,

Why not play the ball (ANGS) instead of the man (the poster)?

Best wishes, wherever your "realism" takes you next.

and vice versa.

Boyo 198
Wolfbag 203
Hawkey 206
Bunks 219
broadland220
ocelot 225
Withoutt 228
Flying farmer240

It doesn't sound as if ANGS or, indeed, AIM is for you, HeadinTheSand.

GL is Angus's MD.

This board is for discussion of Angus.

If you look at other boards, you'll find it is not unusual for the company's CEO to be quoted.

PiranhaPires,

Given the importance of the mining sector to the FTSE100, I think you're being a bit harsh to suggest that the City doesn't know anything about what it's investing in.

Thank you for your comments, gentlemen.

Wishing all posters a good weekend.

£150k loan conversion.