Member Info for Noviceinv

Media love a bit of scaremongering in my opinion. Cast your eyes and ears back to 91 or 94 I think sometime around then maybe someone else can clarify, but the media claimed doom and gloom with things which essentially caused a recession and pushed oil prices sky rocketed. It’s like when people rush to buy petrol because it’s running out, then the media report it and it gets worse and worse. Sometimes too much info is worse imo. There will be spikes of this virus I do agree however this is expected? We are opening up places so there will be a spike. But it’s not going to be as bad as it was before. Vaccines are also on their way out for everyone. As for your question on oil price, I think that oil price is where it is at because traders are still worried about second waves and all that? So the effect of second waves has already been felt (it’s not new news). I can’t really comment on drill date and merger as hard to understand the impact. Contracts are signed to provide the drill, it would be hard for anyone to make a u turn on that. Merger? Well that can change yes, but something fundamentally would have to massively have changed for these things to be cancelled. Don’t forget the merger took place because of partly the covid pandemnic and partly because of the efficiencies that can be had by joining the two companies together. In my opinion. So your points are valid but unlikely to have a major impact in anything in my opinion.

The Lind Partners is an institutional fund manager and leading provider of growth capital to small- and mid-cap companies publicly traded in the US, Canada, Australia and the UK. Lind targets high growth sectors such as technology, biotech, clean-tech, mining and oil & gas.

Nice that they have a vested interest in all this. Obviously know what they are doing right!!!

I think the reason push laalee is because the people who are for it and positive just get frustrated by the lack of understand of other people. And also the lack of seeing things which are good. I do agree with your comment in that things are sometimes frustrating. Especially for lth, I am one as well. The board would be a boring place if everyone agreed and had no debate so I do appreciate others opinions too.

Xx

Yes because that’s what she is paid to do . Lol lol.

Great to chat about bpc all day

Irene krapp krapp you are back with your deramping again? I thought the shorters stopped your salary a week ago when they realised that you can’t deramp a share that is going to be successful with large movements? Then makes you look cra* at your job. Just for the record, I did not get that information from another bb board. This person has over 20 years experience in the industry, not just m and a, but the broader stock market and banking in general. My point is she has a lot of experience and I can assure you there is no bias in this bit of advice. 100%

Xx

I had an hour long conversation last night with an expert on the aim market because I was getting a bit peed off with the negative comments on here. So managed to speak with an expert on it. Couple of the main points that I got from the chat:

1.) pension funds like what has been mentioned have to show a broad risk based investment strategy and not just keep to the ftse 250/100. It’s too easy and they would just be making a mere 7/8 % a year if they are lucky. Aim market albeit more risky could demonstrate a 10/11% but more likely much higher rate of return. That being said, they still have to do their to do their due diligence on companies to make sure what they are investing in has a good rated risk portfolio. This filled me some good reassurance on Bpc.

2.) takeover/merger - before this proceeds, it is a requirement of any company on any market to perform a stress test before the deal can be finalised. The fact the deal has been finalised and awaiting for shareholder approval fills me with excitement that the financials are ok.

3.) when a merger and takeover is announced, the share price is artificially kept at a certain level and the MM will not let it rise uncontrollably. This is a fact. I think someone touched upon it the other day but was met with some opposition. I didn’t really believe it a few days ago either but it is true. It’s there and done to ensure a fair option for shareholders and new comers etc etc. Again fills me with reassurance.

4.) after a deep dive of this takeover/merger, they told me that in their opinion, it’s a good deal (I have already voted yes anyway but it was good to get their view). Provides an income to bpc shareholders along with tangible assets, and for cerp it gives them greater investment and chance to progress their company. Nobody loses out.

5.) breaking news, rns are kept back during this period and especially during the 10 day disclosure period. They can be released after the 10 day period. Again this is to ensure transparency. They are released however if there is a risk the news can be leaked.

Apologies if the above is what you already knew. I was so pleased after my conversation last night, and it just filled me with excitement on what such a great investment I am in all in my (or their) opinion of course. I wouldn’t want to be out of this for any length of time.

Good luck all.

Xxxxx

Bully- people aren’t selling selling shares because of the merger being in your opinion negative. And as for it being explained numerous times.... more like people are trying to drum into people that the merger is negative and all so bad in my opinion because they are trying their best to deramp both shares (probably getting paid for it). There is only a couple of derampers on here, I suspect that they both are the same person and if not, then are definitely sitting on each other’s laps in an office together paid by a short broker. The merger is a fantastic opportunity on multiple levelss. Both beneficial to both set of shareholders. Hence why we have some BIG PLAYERS buying into BOTH shares. Enjoy the deramping bully. But it won’t last and then when the share price rockets after news of certain events , you will be know where to be seen.

Gla

Xxx

Hypothetically let’s say it is being controlled. Why do you think this is?

I quite agree... I’d like to know why it keeps going up and down like that. It’s like a heart rate!! More specifically, is it being controlled so it doesn’t reach a certain level? If so why? Maybe star can shed some light.

Thank you..... I’m learning be gentle lol.

Star I didn’t get this “moby in the water” joke last time. What’s meant by it?

Lol very good, sort of thing my in-law would say. Very good research star (as always). I did notice that sitting at the bottom of the rns, but unlike you I thought nothing of it when really I should have wondered what it was and researched it. Just looked them up too and I totally agree with your comments. Everything it starting to come into place imo and I am very excited to be in Bpc. My suspicions Also in that they probably can now release more positive rns now the 8.5 forms are all out the way.

Sorry star I been engrossed working today so haven’t really caught up on the bb. Ok I didn’t know if there was a hard set rule against it. I guess if information is at risk of leaking then they have to release an rns anyway!! I’m glad you feel as happy as a free range turkey lol that did make me laugh. Good soh.

Star- here’s a question for you then because my knowledge on takeovers is somewhat limited. Does a company have to wait the 10 days after making the takeover (merger whatever you want to call it) announcement before they release any major new rns announcements? I.e once a merger is announced, is the company then forbidden to release any further rns that could specifically push the share price up? What’s the rules? Cheers

How do you know that they have acquired these?

Fair point Chris.... I’m sure there are plenty who don’t and who don’t get the approval from their trustees. Definitely been a shift in investment in the energy sector over the last 5 years. Bpc though I think is different and a “one off”. I think their share price is highly underrated and under priced but as someone said earlier this is probably linked to the fact if the merger. Which I would tend to agree with. But brakes I’m sure will be let off as more rns news comes out

Peter tee, what outcome of the elections is preferred for the Benefit on matd? Or does it not make any difference to us? When do the elections likely get finalised?

I haven’t lied about anything nor did imply that I had. I was just surprised that you expected me to reveal which hedge fund/pension fund was heavily invested in bpc and the wider energy market? Telling people that sort of detail is just asking for trouble. But my facts are correct and true. If I can prove it another way l that doesn’t infringe on data protection and market abuse then please advise and I’ll happily oblige.

Anyway.... I was just disagreeing with your point when you stated that a pension fund wouldn’t invest in something like this. ThAts ok isn’t it? Not being rude.

Honestly you really think I’d be stupid enough to give you that information?

You don’t have to believe it, I don’t care if you do or you don’t. And again, filter me if you like. Where discredit of this share is due I’ll happily contribute however when you give a fact which I know not to be true from personal Experience then yes of course I’ll state it. Filter away.

You have the option to select your pension depending on who you work for. High/medium/low risk. These would be in the high risk, albeit I’d argue they are now in the medium to high risk. Al
Comments are obviously in my opinion