Member Info for Nottspie

Having an Opinion set as "strong sell" and holding, or having an Opinion set as "No Opinion", then posting exclusively negative or sarcastic opinion. Confusing, to say the least. But then again, not being a savvy investor, its probably above my head. Any savvy investors out there care to explain?

from Savvy investors. I was thinking of buying this a year ago at 0.12. I changed my mind and left it until it was 0.05 then I bought. What advice could you give me in this predicament?

brilliant. Boasting about what a great savvy investor he is. Sympathising with my predicament. LOL.

Indeed, a startling observation from you taste, you have pointed out something there which singles you out as a savvy investor. If you sniff out a share that makes you a profit it is better than one that dosnt. A real road to Damascus moment for me that. Oh, and to paraphrase you," all the majority of them" have dropped over the last six months.The vast majority, infact.

Certainly not this one. But as someone who bought in about six months ago at 0.05 sp I am highly delighted with the fact that it has maintained its sp, in stark contrast to the majority of AIM listed shares over the same period.

expects the sp to go up. Otherwise they would sell. Quite easy to work out really. Unless of course they are holding expecting it to fall, which would make them stupid, I guess.

I reckon this is an absolute pearler of an rns the more I think about it. Got quite a few here, trying to add be wont let me buy any. MMs being ultra cautious here.

Sorry, hard to get this moving UPWARDS atm. Goes down as easy as anything.

gotta be good news. Hard to get this thing moving atm.

when the highlight of the report is how little money they lost. Dont think it warrants 17% drop in sp though.

You still in here? The ultimate enigma this share. They used to regularly get contracts and it dropped and dropped. Got out at just above my average of 0.33 (old money) only to see it rise another 20% on winning no contracts!!! AIM at its most baffling. GL all here, must be some news soon.

Probably a strong buy because we are 66% up on year low. Right to say we are down from year high of January 2015 (show me an aim share that isnt, not many of them) but up 66% from year low of less than a week ago. I am assuming you have used LSE data to arrive at your figures, so I have done the same.

Soon clear. Final results due in next month or so. Interesting to see how the interest payments have effected cash burn.

lets be clear about this. Misleading is posting a factually incorrect statement such as Manas coal being too radioactive to sell, or quoting trading volumes that are factually incorrect. I disagree with hundreds of posts on here but very few are misleading. Infantile, yes, but not misleading. To accuse someone of that is to accuse them of a possible crime (see FCA box above) and MUST be supported by evidence. If no evidence is presented, this must be dealt with in the strongest possible manner.

selling yesterday @ 0.62 buying today @ 0.78. IMHO one to sit on and wait.

Leed is contributing A$1.2 million of funding towards a 4 year, A$3.25 million secured convertible note financing being issued by Battalion. The note has a 12% coupon for first two years, followed by two years at 14%, if not converted · Battalion's major shareholders are contributing to the convertible note alongside Leed · The convertible note benefits from a first ranking general security agreement provided by HM · HM has generated monthly revenues of between A$1.2 million and A$1.5 million over last 6 months from which the interest can be comfortably serviced. The note is convertible into equity which would result in Leed holding up to 15% of Battalion, equating to an equity interest of 11% of HM · If Leed converts its notes into equity, the conversion price will be at a 25% discount to the price at which Battalion acquired control of HM earlier in 2014 and at a multiple of approximately 1.4 times the current base case 2015 EBITDA HM forecast

how the increased expenditure of HM has an effect on LDP. We lent them money, get a payment, and have the option to convert to equity on favourable terms in the future should we so wish. If HM spend an extra AS10m this year we will not have to spend a penny more. The lack of understanding here is breathtaking. As for more trips to Australia, thats got to be the most laughable comment ever on here. (takes some doing). The deal is done, no further input required. Percentage rolls in every year, as equity goes up in value. Please could someone tell me what LDPs additional costs are. There are none.

any future increase in value that Leed get is through conversion to equity of their loan note in HM, at a 25% discount to the price paid by Battalion earlier in the year. As the value of HM raises due to increased profits so does Leeds investment value increase. This investment is AS$1.2m . If they converted half to equity at an increased value (further discounted by their favourable agreement) they would have more than sufficient to re invest and expand elsewhere. Protected against any increase in costs, but able to reap the benefits of expansion. Thats what I call a great deal.

Really? If the expenses of Battalion increase, how does that effect our loan note? If their profitability increases, so does their value, and our loan note option to convert to equity rises in value. How would Leeds expenses increase due to the expansion of Battalions business?

"aren't we all glad to hear that". Glad to see you feel you have the right to comment for us all. No further comment required.