Member Info for Notposting

That’s not the line I have pushed at all. In fact I challenged Aldebaran his comment on it. Once again, that’s your narrative. Not fact.

And how’s the experience of said scientist gone for him in previous investments? Ah right. 🫣

Diggittt. I suggest you stop manipulating it to fit your narrative as you appear to do repeatedly. That was posted in a point to you, not as part of the main discussion points as you are fully aware.

The facts are as follows:

To address this anticipated funding shortfall, the Group will require additional working capital of approximately £5.6 MILLION BY THE END OF JANUARY 2026 in order to continue its product development activities, with a primary focus on HG-CT-1, to the end of 2026 and an additional £10 million during the period from 2027 to 2028

The Group will have insufficient working capital after Admission, and further funds will be required to be invested in the first quarter of 2026 for the Group to continue its activities and thereafter to complete Phase I trials of HG-CT-1 in both adult and pediatric patients.

The Company is of the opinion that the working capital available to the Group will be insufficient for its present requirements, that is, for at least the next 12 months from the date of this document.

My other point was

“He has already provided a strong signal, totalling £5.6m. If you all genuinely believe in the long-term potential of the company, even up to a potential buyout, you would be investing at the current market capitalisation with warrants priced for a £80m, 90m, or even £100m valuation should still offer substantial upside. True supportive investors would have participated in the previous placing on terms with warrants reflecting future multiples rather than the valuation at the time. Instead, the placing was structured primarily for self-interest, not genuine support, and it imposed selling pressure that benefited those recycling shares rather than the company or its long-term shareholders.”

Have a good morning 🫠

If you want to keep making things up under your alias account, go ahead 😆. In reality, nothing happened. A post was taken out of context and later clarified, not that it manipulated anything to start off with. Nice try, though.

TraderRicky.

Notposting

Posted in: HEMO

Posts: 560

RE: The big tiger 🐅 bounce back has started27 Nov 2025 19:26

You don’t know 50% of the shareholder base. That claim is as fanciful as your supposed trip abroad to visit your “special friend.” And as for “investing,” what exactly do you think has been driving the recent volume and price action? These are not simply warrants. When people like you say you are “investing,” what you really mean is that you will dump shares, then re-enter under the false pretence of paying a premium for a placing after causing the very damage you exploit and with free warrants to boot. It is not support for the company or its shareholders; it is self-serving opportunism dressed up as contribution.

As for points 2 and 3.. Nothing will likely move forward with the next cohort dosing until funding is secured, and even then progress is unlikely before late Q1 or early Q2, depending on when the manufacturing transfer process actually began from best guess.

Agreed.

Notposting

Posted in: HEMO

Posts: 559

RE: The big tiger 🐅 bounce back has started27 Nov 2025 19:34

“Vlad only needs to give the signal and the funding would be in place, and yet there are numerous other cash-rich investors who would not hesitate to commit significant sums.”

He has already provided a strong signal, totalling £5.6m. If you all genuinely believe in the long-term potential of the company, even up to a potential buyout, you would be investing at the current market capitalisation with warrants priced for a £80m, 90m, or even £100m valuation should still offer substantial upside. True supportive investors would have participated in the previous placing on terms with warrants reflecting future multiples rather than the valuation at the time. Instead, the placing was structured primarily for self-interest, not genuine support, and it imposed selling pressure that benefited those recycling shares rather than the company or its long-term shareholders.

“Vlad only needs to give the signal and the funding would be in place, and yet there are numerous other cash-rich investors who would not hesitate to commit significant sums.”

He has already provided a strong signal, totalling £5.6m. If you all genuinely believe in the long-term potential of the company, even up to a potential buyout, you would be investing at the current market capitalisation with warrants priced for a £80m, 90m, or even £100m valuation should still offer substantial upside. True supportive investors would have participated in the previous placing on terms with warrants reflecting future multiples rather than the valuation at the time. Instead, the placing was structured primarily for self-interest, not genuine support, and it imposed selling pressure that benefited those recycling shares rather than the company or its long-term shareholders.

You don’t know 50% of the shareholder base. That claim is as fanciful as your supposed trip abroad to visit your “special friend.” And as for “investing,” what exactly do you think has been driving the recent volume and price action? These are not simply warrants. When people like you say you are “investing,” what you really mean is that you will dump shares, then re-enter under the false pretence of paying a premium for a placing after causing the very damage you exploit and with free warrants to boot. It is not support for the company or its shareholders; it is self-serving opportunism dressed up as contribution.

As for points 2 and 3.. Nothing will likely move forward with the next cohort dosing until funding is secured, and even then progress is unlikely before late Q1 or early Q2, depending on when the manufacturing transfer process actually began from best guess.

DaveyDavey. “‘Mr Mojo told him off like a school head teacher lool.’

It seems your difficulty in following the conversation may stem from a lack of basic education. It’s almost as unfortunate as your need to operate under multiple aliases.

Hope TraderRicky is okay. 🫠

The only thing being summoned is £5.6m in funds to simply continue operations, Diggittt.

Well, it isn’t because there’s no bite. I’ll post it myself, so don’t worry. Unlike what you’re used to, I have nothing to hide.

I’m okay. I’ll continue posting when and as appropriate. Nice try, though. You got the disingenuous, all-excitable-for-a-few-seconds.

The Company is presently operationally but NOT financially ready and prepared to continue Phase I clinical trials of HG-CT-1.

Must go. The FCA is calling.

I know it appears difficult for you.

Notposting

Posted in: HEMO

Posts: 533

RE: The “LTHs” trading19 Nov 2025 23:27

It’s straight from the official documentation unlike the stuff you lot keep making up whenever it suits you. 😘 Keep trying to hide it. JustHereForFleecing, no one cares whether they sell or not, or about you using alias accounts to pretend you’re someone else. Your dishonesty is showing yet again.

To address this anticipated funding shortfall, the Group will require additional working capital of approximately £5.6 MILLION BY THE END OF JANUARY 2026 in order to continue its product development activities, with a primary focus on HG-CT-1, to the end of 2026 and an additional £10 million during the period from 2027 to 2028

The Group will have insufficient working capital after Admission, and further funds will be required to be invested in the first quarter of 2026 for the Group to continue its activities and thereafter to complete Phase I trials of HG-CT-1 in both adult and pediatric patients.

The Company is of the opinion that the working capital available to the Group will be insufficient for its present requirements, that is, for at least the next 12 months from the date of this document. Following Admission, the

Directors expect that the Group will have an aggregate funding shortfall of approximately £15.6 million to

That was the original post. I only expanded on it later because I was dealing with people who hadn’t even read the prospectus yet felt confident making uninformed comments. The additional emphasis was simply to address their points. So if we’re talking about manipulation, it’s worth asking who actually removed the context.

I posted the full abstracts verbatim on the day they were released, which anyone can see in my history. So, as I said, it’s not quite the “catch” some are claiming. Oopsie. x

But that reminds me actually.

I won’t lose sleep, Diggittt. 😆

The point stands you can’t continue operations and need £5.6m before end of January 2026 to simply continue operations. 🥱

“If that is as you suggest (and I have no reason to doubt at this point)”

LOL if only someone had… I don’t know linked an official prospectus to their post that shows the minor emphasis like I have throughout with capitals too expect just capitalised words. Love these dramatic attempts for a “got you” moment 😆😆😆

There’s no need to, Diggittt. I’ve already made it clear that there has been emphasis added and that it does not materially change the point being made. It isn’t the “catch” you’re trying to portray it as. You’re really no different from the rest, sadly. It seems you’ve run out of anything else to say, so you’re just clinging to whatever you can. 🫠

I’ll let people talk for now. I have things to flag that are far more important.