Member Info for Notposting

Shicky. It’s evident you can’t read, but most of the board can.

Don’t put words in my mouth.

Sad to see you still haven’t developed any decency.

No one can accurately know profit margins or commercial terms at this stage, and JustHereForFleecing suggesting someone call the manufacturer to confirm costs is ludicrous and simply not even possible for sensitive commercial terms and it tells you how dangerous such comments are, nor does he know the cost element of these processes like his message is trying to imply.

The share price will move primarily based on clinical trial progress and news flow. If trials continue successfully, interest and the share price are likely to rise. If trials hit setbacks, the opposite may occur.

Commercial terms will remain unknown until agreements with major pharma partners are made. Regardless, shareholders stand to benefit if successful partnerships materialise. If not, dilution will likely continue.

Estonia is unlikely to fund the trials alone nor would you want it to as it will not allow the pace required. Anyone suggesting otherwise is naive and that’s IF it progresses at all.

In short, making statements of fact on speculative items that cannot be known at this stage is unproductive; the key drivers are trial results and tangible news updates not the utterly nonsensical suggestion of traders placing “A” trades to manipulate the share price for a few percent 🤡🤯

Both the rampers and those attempting to talk the stock down on a board like this are missing the point.

For a long-term holder who believes the ultimate outcome is a buyout, daily share price fluctuations are largely irrelevant. Short-term noise should not factor into the investment decisions.

HemoLie, welcome back. I’m guessing you still haven’t learnt anything about abusing people online?

I didn’t say it isn’t a de-risking event for the next stage. My point is that it proves nothing about ultimate success or failure, nor does it substantiate the claims being thrown around.

Nice attempt, but try reading the comment properly before bending it to suit your narrative. This isn’t the first time you’ve done that either.

Also Aldebaran, you haven’t mentioned AVACTA enough today. Step up your trolling game.

On a serious note, are you okay? You’re acting like the inverse of JustHereForFleecing, who is completely clueless and invents things on the spot, then presents them as fact or insider knowledge, only to be repeatedly proven to be full of it.

As much as I hate the hype, you’re also not helping by doing the opposite. What’s the point? The share price will move as it moves, depending on the news flow or lack of.

“agree the risk of ultimate failure right now is vastly reduced - as indicated in the DSMB which factually states it dose escalation recommendation de-risks the program”

😆😆😆🤡 the DSMB does not indicate anything about the overall success as such, let alone “ultimate” anything.

🤯🤯🤯

The gift that just keeps giving.

Also rather than backtracking on your misleading statements, perhaps you could acknowledge where you have been incorrect and learn from it. That may prevent such exchanges and make the board more pleasant for all.

You continue to belittle others and post as if you were a leading scientist, yet without any proper evaluation of risk.

That, as you can appreciate, is particularly dangerous on a board of this nature, given the number of gullible investors involved.

You never had, nor will, as I have clearly stated.

I have already provided substantiated support for my arguments, which I encourage you to review if genuine engagement were your intention. In future, I would appreciate it if you refrained from misleading others, so that further commentary on my part becomes unnecessary.

I am not your PA, nor will I repeatedly revisit points you have conveniently chosen to disregard, particularly when they unequivocally demonstrate the inaccuracy of your statements.

Every challenge I have raised has been accompanied by supporting evidence. None have been negative, nor have they suggested a lower or higher share price. It remains to be seen whether you possess the integrity to acknowledge this or whether you will continue to feed a narrative at the expense of credibility.

Is it as true as reading the DSMB report, proving efficacy, it being a proven “cure,” the claims of a 1BN valuation? The riskiest part done? That it can already become the “standard of care”? Children never having being approved this early on etc etc?

😆😆😆 Not attacking you. It’s just calling out the misleading hype. Just waiting for HemoLie to try and join the big boys’ club.

You’ll never green bin me 🥱

PS I’ve got A trades to put on, so don’t worry. I’ll come back to you when I’m back.

Don’t forget to follow Hemogenyx back in the meanwhile for your trade x

Oh and please enlighten me.

“UNFOLLOWING Hemogenyx the exact same time as your Twitter post”

I don’t have Twitter, so this should be interesting 🤡

Was the post signed off by a mystical creature too?

😆😆😆😆

That your idea of “not replying”? 😆😆😆

I’ve never removed Hemogenyx from my quick picks as it’s been there since day one and remains there to this day. Not that it matters, of course, since I’m not here playing the saint or calling out traders… that would be you 😉

As I said. Nice try.

Ps did he read it like he read the DSMB report? Ooopsie x

😆😆😆😆 delusional. Nice try.

LOL, more like this: comfortably sat on risk-free warrants, fleeced from shareholders through unnecessary dilution and sheer greed. No need to hype or ramp anymore. He’s already cashed out and moved to the next stage.

Funny how a ‘long-term holder’ suddenly decides to remove a stock… almost makes you wonder 😆😆😆. Disingenuous trader to the core.

JustHereForFleecing in the (Last 30 Days) Oooooooopsie x

» 1 day ago - Removed Zambeef Prod. (ZAM) from

Quickpicks

» 5 days ago - Removed Hemogenyx Pharmaceuticals

(HEMO) from Timeline

» 14 Oct 2025 - Added Hemogenyx Pharmaceuticals

(HEMO) to Quickpicks

» 14 Oct 2025 - Removed Hemogenyx Pharmaceuticals

(HEMO) from Quickpicks

» 7 Oct 2025 - Added UK Oil & Gas (UKOG) to Quickpicks

» 7 Oct 2025 - Removed Helium One (HE1) from

I doubt you’d put me in the green bin as your narcissistic streak wouldn’t let you miss anything said about you.

Present it as an opinion rather than stating it as fact. You would think, after being called out/ fact checked multiple times for intentionally misleading statements, that you might have learned by now.

“who have a £1b+ valued asset” - another opinion stated as fact.

No one’s valued at £1b at this time. Fact.

I’m fine, thanks. You’re just showing yourself up, not winning anything. Cats are graceful, composed, and clever. You might learn a thing or two from them.

Sleep well. As I mentioned yesterday it does wonders for the brain.

3 likes so far on a post mocking a woman’s biology. Shows the basic decency on this board. 🤯🫣