Member Info for NoelShempsky

Slimeball - what is the share price now and, for far too long, what have you been telling us it would be by now?

The slimeball totally proves himself to be a LIAR - he has not filtered my comments. Liar, liar,liar.

"No Privacy, No Property: The World in 2030 According to the WEF"

https://mises.org/wire/no-privacy-no-property-world-2030-according-wef

Forgot to say - after The Great Reset, none of us will own anything - not even the clothes on your back. It is scary.

Peter Schiff, Rick Rule, money printing -- all good for gold - true, I agree, but I've been reading that stuff for 18 years. I'm a fan of Jim Sinclair, Egon von Greyerz, James Turk and others and from 2002 for 2011 their views made me a lot of money on mining and oil shares - then it all went wrong.

My PM stocks are now starting to recover and I have high hopes for the future of TSG - more than high hopes - a firm commitment through a large holding, but jointhedots is right.

All of the arguments of Schiff, Rule, von Greyerz, and others, are right in theory - however, they have been right in theory for many years but we haven't seen the big collapse of currencies and I see no reason why the big collapse of currencies will happen soon. The central banks are still in control.

I hope and expect TSG to make a good bit of money for me, but there could be dips on the way and it is not without its risks - all stocks carry risk. Let's have respect for all opinions as part of sensible debate.

Yesterday , no comments were posted in this madhouse. Did they increase our medication or were we mot let out of the cells?

These are not my words - they are from another poster on another board, but they sum up my point exactly -

"We can't have a debate if everyone just sees things through rosy coloured specs."

"There is a tendency of some on the BB to stifle debate by jumping on anything perceived as negative - personally I like healthy debate otherwise we miss learning opportunities and are the poorer for it.

I urge everyone to post their views as long as it is honest and pertaining to ***, and those that don't like like need to toughen up a bit."

Hi elgordo. Thanks for your replies. I'm not sure what you mean 40p to 70p is quite a range. If you watch that short video then look at the CNR 3Y chart you might see how I arrived at those numbers.

I'm happy to listen to opposing views and people telling me I'm wrong. All reasoned debate is welcome by me.

Being called a pr_ick reminded me of a few months ago on the HOC board. HOC was one of my major holdings.

A few months ago it was in the 240p to 250p range. The chart suggested a fall to 200p maybe even 180p.

I posted that on the HOC board, and got a load of abuse from snowflakes whose feelings had been hurt. Someone called me an idiot and said it was going to 350p.

I said I agreed that 350p will come - one day - but before then there will be a drop.

Today it is in the 190p to 200p range.

I sold my HOC shares and bought back at a much lower price.

Okay, the snowflakes don't want to know about drops, but they are adults and should be able to take news like that, not cry like a child who has been told that Santa died.

By the way - the chart pattern for HOC was crystal clear so I was very sure about a drop coming - the current one for CNR is not so clear (but maybe it is to a real expert). Patterns can be tricky and can suddenly fail, so think carefully before trying to catch the drop to 43p that I suggested might occur.

It's about making money, not about trying to be clever and being right. I freely admit that I am not an expert on TA and that my opinion might turn out to be wrong and I welcome opposing views to help me, but why do people start casting abuse just for trying to talk about it?

This "head in the sand", "don't want to know that the price can go down" attitude reminds me of Homer Simpson.

There was a red light on his car's dashboard warning of some fault on the engine. He solved it by putting a piece of sticking plaster over the red light so that he couldn't see it - problem solved.

Just look at that - all he wants is a fairy tale - no realism. I wonder what snowflake ISAPENSION does on days when it does go down? I expect he gets through two boxes of tissues.

Should have been - "but neither optimism nor pessimism".

It isn't new found optimism elgordo. That was the result of my analysis of the chart. My initial look suggested 40p. I am not an expert on chart patterns, so I posted asking for help on the subject. I tried to initiate a bit of chat in the hope that there would be someone who is more knowledgeable and who would give their opinion. Sadly, I got got mainly abuse, just for trying to discuss the possibility that the share price might go down. I'm sure their head in the sand attitude won't help them to make money.

Since there was no help offered, I did a bit of research on triangles and pennants and I came up with this new forecast - which may or may not be right, but optimism nor pessimism comes into it - it is analysis and being realistic about the fact that share prices go down as well as up.

If some people do not want to hear about that then they are snowflakes who cannot have an adult debate.

... breakout to hit 70p.

How to Use Symmetrical Triangle Price Patterns
https://www.youtube.com/watch?v=suZWE832018

Yesterday Connect1 wrote "We’ve got some fantastic posters with incredible knowledge on here, whether they’re ultimately right or wrong time will tell, but I certainly appreciate them"

I agree and, in fact, in the last three months posts on here influenced me to increase my holding, so you see I am on here for genuine debate and not to start arguments, but as a supporter of free speech, I will voice my objection to anyone who tries to tell other people what to say or not say and who wants only their opinion (a rising sp) to be spoken on here.

In today's news - "Pound plunges against Dollar and Euro after annoucement London will move into Tier 3" - so when they set the exchange rate for the dividend we get more GBP.

what does this mean "has no regard for others" - ? i think shows that he is offended by me having an opinion that he doesn't like - the very definition of a bigot.

What did I say earlier to Connect1 who said - "you’re entitled to your opinions". I said "sadly, there seems to be very few people who share that view,"

ISAPENSION has proved me right. He is one of those dolts who want only to talk about the sp going up. He takes offense just because someone says it might go down. Bigotted oafs - they're everywhere.

tester - thanks for the reply and fair enough - I hope my words didn't sound aggressive, just a bit blunt.

ISAPENSION - he has apologised, and I give credit to people who are big enough to do so, as I do if I need to. Don't you tell people what they may or may not say on here.

"now many years ago" should have been "how many years ago" I was in a rush and just knocked out a quick message.