Member Info for NikeAir180

He dismissed the Prime Minister, the Government is currenty dissolved but peple but members of the dissolved government are carrying out their duties, the next appointment of Prime Minister will presumably enable the next Government to be reformed.

Seems on the surface that the dissolution has been based around one person but not so much multiple persons, of the government.

22miles over the sea, the tenure of a country's Prime Minister is abruptly up, circumstances may vary.

Beira and Harare... the 200 tonnes was also referenced by comment from the auditors in last year's annual report - observing what RRR had stated. Less gold required this year to buy a pup but such is never just for Christmas.

2bob Boring and at least a fact short of a fiver.

Subversive response at 16:09 by Banbury and not worthy of respect.

Now, with regard to 12:54 and 12:47:

When I was reading back over six months relevant to the other thread, I found a post by Helpful on 31/07/24 - think it was at 06:46 and that the date is correct. The thought experiment was for 0.2 not at 0.25 - " a rise", possibly the comment was a response to other comments and the earlier context, within the post, was setting up the thought experiment with an imagined possibily of some good news. It was both a thought experiment and rhetorical.

... thread...

I have now clarified and corrected properly by 14:08 on the relevant to which Zumore was responding, by opening up this one.

Cheers...

Yep, have now gone back six monts and if nothing has changed relevant to one of Helpful's posts on 18/07/24, I was almost certainly wrong at the start of 23:30 yesterday, as had actually been thinking of a comment in relation (by way of reply) to a recent real placing which he didn't participate in... can't find that one but I do remember the comment, was looking more closely for the CLN's stuff.

In principle, I don't regard it as anyone else's business but if someone mentions they have such and then someone tries to incorrectly attack, anyone can counter, though should also be prepared to correct themselves and acknowledge genuine correction from someone else.

I regard the second half of yesterday's 23:30 post as reasonable.

Helpful re. my 23:30 post on this thread, I think I may have mixed up a comment you said with reference to the most recent or one of the most recent placings - by way of reply to someone, in that you didn't participate and don't have any shares relevant to that one. Feel free to clarify or correct the 23:30 post if you wish but really it is up to you, in spite of occasional griping of naysayer(s).

This consideration of ammendment from me is only with regard to the first part of 23:30.

Thank you Zumore regarding 09:38 which jogged my memory, though couldn't find either way on a skim read last three months what I am about to posit for likely ammendment.

Buying shares this week would suggests he does not know what is happening; anyone who guesses is someone without knowledge.

Fair comment Eddie... (battery was out earler). I suppose too much belligerence on either side is like raising the volume without hearing the sound.

Yep, most people don't know and haven't met each other re. this share chat but from what I have read it is very likely Eddie is invested. I get MD's point about volume and Willec, IFK has made some good points about volume from time to time. Progress is still progress though, if it is sustained. I don't think it is necessary for Meadow to so often be scornful of Willec if he says that he sees a little bit of upside approaching and it has been quite a good day today... it is an open forum though, so a bit out of chilling out attitude can help or even the filter if it is difficult not to get into a back and forth tumble of posts.

Totally appreciate there are long term and genuine investors here, sometimes there are going to be newer investors with their own enthusiasm, there's room for a liitle bit of mild cynicism and some assertive enthusiam - a little bit of respect - remembering that both holders of perspectives may have made a good choice, might help.

Well I think your senses are clouding your perception Theeeduke: within the last several weeks I remember Helpful - with regard to this stock - replying to someone that he didn't have any CLN's at the moment.

Also, if someone did have CLN's but there was no status change and all the relevant regulations were followed, I am guessing they could also buy shares in the same company, unrelated to their CLN's, if they wanted to, while various stakeholders, theoretically including such a participant, wonder what the next news will be.

They could be right - Willec and co but perhaps it is just that not everyone agrees sentiment wise all at the same time or perhaps most positive sentiment people have until recently taken their positions, maybe this week's presentation will imbue more positivity, perhaps a few more will notice SNDA, all variables for which no-one really knows how and if people are experiencing them.

It's not humble.

Was responding to 19:35...

Re. The "99% loss" might have happened anyway, it is not dependent on Helpful. I know Bell worked with Johnson at Greatland Gold, Johnson helped the share price recover from the zeroes to around 2.5p before leaving, think Bell was there throughtout that period of recovery; what I do know is that Bell brought in the funding partner that helped Gretaland Gold (name of that explorer junior company at the time) to be able go forward and make the world class discovery that they did.

Nice, Helpful and futher too 18:08 & 17, there was a multilateral meeting but bearing in mind Banbury's ignorant claim to nonsense at 17:26 - that meeting, was not in America.

Still in Angola... by the looks of it Banbury, think you were a bit too urgent today.