Member Info for Newuncle

Post 10:55 screen shot taken and reported to interested parties.

No one is being paid to post here.

To say otherwise is false and malicious and misleading

Post 10:51 reported...totally abusive behaviour designed to goad a response

NO

If one looks at the timing of these submissions it clearly shows they are being submitted chronologically to have maximum impact in lengthening the time required to address each one......and in the knowledge that court resources are very limited timewise in hearing these cases.

It's just so blatantly serving one purpose.

Sept 2025

Dec 2025

Jan 2026

May 2026

Affrm FYI fwiw

10-Sep-25 Lewis Steeper v Pennpetro Energy PLC

Part 8 Claim - Miscellaneous Application under the Companies Act

CR-2025-006258

22-Dec-25 Blomqvist v Lunn, Pennpetro Energy Plc, Petroquest Eneryg Limited, Michael Carrick, Aventa Capital Partners Ltd

Part 7 Claim - Miscellaneous

BL-2025-001643

16-Jan-26 Jesse White v Pennpetro Energy Plc

Part 8 Claim - Amend the Register at Companies House

CR-2026-000312

May-26

LSE Takeover Panel Complaint re RMD being over 30%

Zag,

Pretty confident we now know all the relevant protaganists involved with efforts to STOP ppp plc coming back.

I am looking at 4 minimum, possibly 6 known significant anti PPP plc players now.

Companies House history not great for that person either

This was an interesting find fwiw

Case Information

Case Number BR-2023-000579

Court/List Bankruptcy

Petition - Creditors

"Today is not gonna go up but not gonna go down either"

Hmmm.............nostradamus

Less than £100 sold

Ddaf so your claims are false then

In terms of the actual truth which the majority on here are unwilling, or paid to not accept.

That is a serious accusation to make.

Names of who is paying and receiving such monies.

For investors and firms, the outcome now hinges on whether the president signs the legislation. Another veto could leave Poland in breach of EU requirements, raising the prospect of market disruption at a time when scrutiny of the sector has intensified.

Good choice

Commentators saying not good...

Slawek Ogorek

It's the same old flawed bill that didn't get presidential approval two times already

Hmmmm....maybe not

The opposition Law and Justice party (PiS) also submitted a separate draft bill proposing a complete ban on all crypto-asset activity in Poland, according to local media.

Community expects another veto despite Zonda controversy

Market participants and crypto commentators reacted critically to the latest Sejm vote, with some expecting the president to veto the legislation again, as repeated parliamentary approvals have not resolved key disputes over supervisory powers and enforcement under KNF.

Critics highlighted ongoing concerns over account and domain blocking provisions, which they say remain largely unchanged despite earlier presidential objections, while proposed safeguards such as stronger judicial oversight were not included in the final text.

They warned that continued deadlock could prolong regulatory uncertainty as Poland aligns with the EU’s MiCA framework ahead of upcoming implementation deadlines in July.

Why is Donald Tusk being investigated? I like him

Oops...admin been busy here

Affrm,

What cake would you like for the 2nd Anniversary? 🥮🎂🍰🍥

Affrm less than 3 months to the 2 year anniversary now