Member Info for needalife

Rodney your post is straight out of aroks misleading posts.

Your post.

"this company has a NPV of towards $4 billion now. 28p amounts to about a third of that. I'd rather keep the asset, see large shareholders sell up if they want to, appoint new management and press on."

1, the npv means what the company could hope for.

2, the market value is what's important, 28p

3, there is not a scrap of evidence to support a counter bid, in fact quite the opposite.

4, has it crossed your mind who those large share holders may sell to.

5, if they sell to jcc, which is highly likely, where do you think that will leave solg.

6, yes, they may have funds to carry on for a year ( I personally doubt it). But carry on in complete mothballs, as no funds for anything but survival.

7, what do you think the new management will do differently with no funds.

8, when our present management team arrived, you hailed them as demi gods. So that didn't work to well for your insight.

9, how bad will a cash raise be for solg, with the lenders knowing we are up siht Creek.

10 if jcc accquire enough shares ( as will be highly likely), they will install their own directors, run down the sp, and pick up solg for a pittance.

Happy for you to correct any of points .

Smikster your post.

"Id thought you be glad people are trying to get you a few more pence for your shares"

That's the whole point.

If it's a no vote, as you multi times a day hysterically plead for.

You won't get me a few more pence, you will in fact decimate what I have.

Vote no at your peril

Ffs sake mf.

I'm all for a bit of optimism .

But your post wasn't looking at scenarios.

It was pure fantasy

Not only that mf.

You've started arok off again.

Jeeeeeeeeez

Mf.

I feel for you.

That was the post of a desperate man.

Any fool can pluck absurd scenarios out of the air.

But we're you found some of that piffle from.

Takes the biscuit.

And your claims of going of tangent and grasping at straws, don't come close to how ridiculous your post was

Quady owns 1.8 million shares.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🥰🤣🥰🥰

I've just gotten up the share sales in the last month from this board alone.

7.8 billion

Solg board, the gift that just keeps giving.

Arok.

Your posts are just waiting to be pulled apart as the tripe they are.

Your latest blockbuster.

"Left alone, we would likely be North of 40p"

We've been left alone for the last ten years you muppet.

And look were that's got us.

28p.

I'm also still waiting for you to produce evidence of your latest lies regarding the npv.

Arok , correct me if im wrong, but the best i can find, is a npv of $4 billion.

And bear in mind a npv valuation is what the company could be worth.

But you neglected to mention the market value of solg.

For yours and others the market value is not a guesstimate . It's what someone is willing to pay.

And for clarity that's 28p a share.

That arok is the evidence.

Not desperate wishful thinking.

FACT

Arok.

Can you post a link to support this claim you made.

"Independent spot‑price analysis still points to an NPV of Alpala alone around US$6.7 bn (roughly £1.60 per share)."

Arok. Evidence, you say.

Apparently I should “look at the evidence” — just not the latest RNS, because that’s inconvenient. No, no… my “reference point” should be a much older announcement, before reality interfered. Because nothing screams credibility like ignoring the most up-to-date facts.

You claim this is just a short-term dip.

Right. A dip so short it could last a very prolonged period — or, inconveniently, never recover at all. But let’s keep calling it short-term if that helps.

You tell us “the resource, data, and strategic value are still there.”

Yes. They’ve been “there” for about 10 years. And in that time, Solg have spectacularly failed to capitalise on them. But sure, this time will be different — because hope.

You say financing can continue.

How, exactly? Solg have already admitted they won’t meet the conditions required to access those funds. But I suppose details are optional when optimism is doing the heavy lifting.

You say another bidder can come forward.

Absolute rubbish. Every shred of evidence points in the opposite direction — but why let that get in the way of a good story?

Arok. Your latest Peter pan addition. Actually has a sentence that's relevant.

That was a complete shock.

The sentence was.

"Look at the evidence"

I strongly support people looking at the evidence.

They will then come to the conclusion that to vote no, will be a costly mistake.

BBG?

That’s got to be fake news.

I mean, have you not read the posts on here?

Trump would never let the Chinese within a million miles of America.

I know this because I’ve read it at least 500–600 times on this board.

Repetition = fact, obviously.

So I assume the other bit of fake news is that a counter-bid won’t happen.

Because, again, I’ve read 500–600 posts confidently assuring me it will.

In fact, we’ve moved beyond if now — I’m seeing the exact day it’s going to happen.

Helpful stuff.

Honestly, I don’t know why people doubt it.

When Rodney and the other sages post something on here, you can be absolutely certain it’s not something they’ve just made up .

More facts.

Is there at this moment funding uncertainty surrounding solg-------Yes

Will the funding issue be more problematic on a no vote------yes

Will the funding uncertainty cause markets major concern------yes

Will that affect the sp---------YES

If a no vote, could jcc mop up bhp, newmont shares, (their clearly happy to sell)-------YES

Could that scenario bring about solg downfall----YES

Will it be for far less than 28p------YES

Could jcc call an egm claiming no confidence in solg board,

Reasons, failure to capitalise on value

Repeated failed strategies

Poor management of finances

Inability to anything signed off with government.

Where will that leave solg.

Vote no at your peril

Shopright.

If the company continues to exist, and jcc have accrued around 50% of the shares, the board will end up with jcc appointed directors.

And then Rodney can go on another crusade. But the end result be the same. Jcc owning solg.

For a lot less than 28p

Vote no at your peril.

Vote with those who know, directors, institutions and major shareholders.

Not desperate out of pocket retail holders whove spat their dummies out.

Interesting post gee.

Why thursday or Friday?

Rodney I posted 13 facts.

What's your response.

I'm nappy to be corrected on any of the 13 that you disagree with

Facts

Have major shareholders agreed to sale-----YES

Have directors unanimously agreed to sale-----YES

Is there any evidence of a counter bid----NO

Will the sp tank on a no vote-------YES

Will we only have enough money after Q2 to stagnate-----YES

Will any cash raise be met with stringent terms----YES

Will this dilute the sp even further------YES

If jcc so wish ,will they eventually pick up solg with a hostile bid for far less than 28p------probably

Will voting no cause uncertainty------YES

Do markets like uncertainty-----NO

Have the last 10 years under solg management been good------NO

Does that instill confidence in the future------NO

Would a sensible inveser invest in a company, that's stated they only have enough money to survive---NO.

Vote no, at your peril

Smikster.

A counter came in around 40p

And people are ticking up your posts.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Rodney , how can you be taken seriously, when you say

Your.

"not worried about going concern or funding matters"

"Schoolboy"

Rodney.

The fact your willing to stay invested in a company, that as you say.

Can keep its lights on.

Shows your strategy in investing.

How many more years will they survive, just keeping their lights on.

And at what cost to the sp.

Anyway, the future will unfold, what it unfolds.