Member Info for needalife

Other, the issue is, adikt can't accept that others can have an opinion other than his.

he feels this obsessive need to try to sway others views, he does this by putting words into others mouths

or inventing imaginary emails to prove his point.

he attempts to show his perceived superior knowledge, this in turn causes others to respond.

I would imagine to live with his controlling personality coupled with his obsessive lying makes him

the partner from hell.

Aquinaga. immediately to the defence of adikt, how sweet.

the dream team,

WALTER AND MITY.

I'm expecting an email to turn up from Irwin any minute now.

they come on cue. somebody getting the better of adikt in a squabble.up pops Irwin.

like buses..... aquinag and Irwin come together.

Hfh. I don't think your being called a Muppet or the chairman of the rampers for being positive.

I think you will find your being accused because of your devotion to the happy clappers, and your

ridiculous optimism, based on nothing but blind faith and wishful thinking.

as yesterday's, golden ticket sh??te portrays.

Padmaster. your late night posts ever since I can remember, have been spent penning ditties

calling any who question solg as imposters infested, derampers, and not being invested.

well I've news for you. my email yesterday has shown that your years of ridiculous denial have done nothing

but show what a bigoted old fool you are.

along with bbg, who claims I'm an uninvested BlackRock stooge.

or the manchild novice, who claims I'm paid by LSE to increase the post count.

or dbw,who's wild claims as he runs round in circles in blind panic screaming take overs coming, and any who disagrees is uninvested

or shipright, who doesn't know what planet he's on

the list is endless., but feels the need to try to be clever

if you add up the posts screaming not invested, and add the amount of clowns who have

recommended the Muppets, if we were still using paper, it would equate to a Forrest of trees.

the only thing they have is common, is there complete silence on there loss of credibility

After my post yesterday blowing bbg and padmasters daily claims I'm not invested out of the water.

I wondered what they were going to do, now that there credibility had been shot away.

but yesterday I note bbg is still spitting venom, and has now turned his attention to claim eloro

isn't invested.

the man's a complete fruit case.

and even more staggering, bearing in mind he was shown to be a Muppet yesterday with his ridiculous

bile spitting claims.

4 posters astonishingly recommended his post.

it come to the point on here, where you can't argue idiot

Adikt. if you like I could post the conversation you had with the two senior CEO, remember,

it was at the time you was putting your point over regarding the two directors we lost.

oddly, they both supported your argument.

or maybe when you was squabbling with others regarding heat pumps, remember you told us of the conversation you had with your next door neighbour, a nuclear physasist no less. and low and behold he supported your view on heat pumps.

bit of a pattern, don't you think

Or this adikt.

this was your ridiculous post after I was ridiculing your posts. bearing in mind

you had spent 3 months screaming from the rooftops you'd filtered me. and telling others

to do the same.

Nal, I've unfiltered you temporarily because I wanted to see what pearls of wisdom seeped from that mush between your ears.

unfiltered me temporarily. what a clown.

and we're supposed to believe your Warren Irwin claims.

and talking of clowns. I see Aquinaga is still defending you. what a dream team you make

and I mean dream team, because you certainly dream them up.

aguinaga has beers with mather. you get 3 emails from in Irwin in 3 weeks.

"

Adikt. or what about this third supposed email you supposedly received from Irwin.

3 emails in a 3 week period from irwin

my god it's to ridiculous for words.

all of which support your argument.

But I emailed WI today and have received a lengthy and helpful reply. The following is a brief summary.

1) He believes SC has 'saved the company' and is pursuing the right strategy. It wasn't easy to cut overheads and to move to Ecuador, but it had to be done. He also referred to the previous mismanagement of the business.

2) The whole board is under pressure and he's expecting some changes after the agm. (Twigger for the chop?)

3) Our holding is a long way down Newmont's list of priorities.

4) He doesn't think BHP are a likely buyer and will be happy to sit and wait for the buyout.

5) He thinks the Chinese are the most likely buyers.

6) He had some mining experts visit the site recently and they came back extremely excited about the project and the 'amazing deposit we have'. He referred to the significant disconnect between the asset and market value.

7) He also referred to how good Sangha is at his job and how his interests are so closely allied to ours.

I was surprised and grateful he took the time to give such a long reply. Point 6 was new information to me.

that is why I call people liars adikt. 3 emails in as many weeks from Irwin.?????

Adikt. not blowing any trumpets,

simply pointing out, that Muppets like you who daily post your made up stories

and ridiculous claims should be treated with a pinch of salt.

furthermore, what is hilarious is this second supposed email you received from Irwin, reci

lived iA reply from Warren to an email I sent this morning:

'I think it was time for both of them to leave the board. Scott is doing a very good job from what I can see. If we lose him, I have no idea who would replace him. Not many people want to live in Ecuador.

I think there are lots of people who want this asset. The issue is no one wants to move first and get topped and look bad.

At some point somebody will move, the asset is too good and Ecuador is becoming one of the better South American jurisdictions'.

might add in the middle of the period you was screaming praise for the solg board.

you will clearly see the email I received is genuine. not some made up sh??te that you

try to convince is genuine.

I refer you to the sentence in my post refering to posters posting rubish

Just a little reminder why members should not pay to much attention to the

likes of bbg, padmaster, shipright and all the other Muppets who daily post

sh??the, .

once again their rubbish, has been proven exactly that, rubbish.

they scream daily that I and others are not invested.

funny then, I received this email this morning.

SolGold Update

Inbox

Sean Tufford

9:41 AM (4 hours ago)

to me

Hello -------

I am reaching out to touch base; see how you’re doing and to update our contact list.

This is not a form email, this is me to you, so feel free to respond.

With new management, new direction, and a renewed energy and optimism about our future in Ecuador, we genuinely want to hear from you.

If you would like an actual conversation on what’s happening at the company, please provide a telephone number for me to reach you.

If you would like a copy of our most recent Corporate Presentation, please let me know.

I look forward to hearing from you.

Sincerely,

Sean Tufford

SOLGOLD plc

1 Cornhill, London, EC3V 3ND, United Kingdom DIRECT (902) 818-8807

Email: stufford@solgold.com.au | Website: www.solgold.com.au

MUPPETS.

Your post that Irwin endorsed. 1) Support a management team which is working on behalf of the smaller shareholders and is moving towards an exit, or;

2) Cause chaos at board level and hand the management of the company on a plate to those organizations who have absolutely no interest in retail investors. They would insist upon funding the route to production with their own equity and in the process would dilute us virtually out of sight.

So far I've seen no logical argument which makes any sense of supporting point 2.

Caldwell is the only thing standing between us and oblivion. (I do like the odd bit of hyperbole!) a couple of days before Irwin emailed you.

Adikt, here's the miraculously on time email you received from Irwin. just after you was canvasing for votes, for the current board.

even you must admit it's one hell of a coincidence, even by the story telling history of you and others on here.But I emailed WI today and have received a lengthy and helpful reply. The following is a brief summary.

1) He believes SC has 'saved the company' and is pursuing the right strategy. It wasn't easy to cut overheads and to move to Ecuador, but it had to be done. He also referred to the previous mismanagement of the business.

2) The whole board is under pressure and he's expecting some changes after the agm. (Twigger for the chop?)

3) Our holding is a long way down Newmont's list of priorities.

4) He doesn't think BHP are a likely buyer and will be happy to sit and wait for the buyout.

5) He thinks the Chinese are the most likely buyers.

6) He had some mining experts visit the site recently and they came back extremely excited about the project and the 'amazing deposit we have'. He referred to the significant disconnect between the asset and market value.

7) He also referred to how good Sangha is at his job and how his interests are so closely allied to ours.

I was surprised and grateful he took the time to give such a long reply. Point 6 was new information to me.

it's on a par with copperpot,and the coffee shop, and Aquinaga having beers with mather

Adikt. one of your many posts supporting the board, probably the right choice, who knows.

I will post the email you received from from Irwin in a short while.

There you go again adikt. your indignation and attempt at deflection alters nothing.

I am simply highlighting the fact that even you, state many theories and ideas that don't stand up to scrutiny.

Mather is clearly not sidelined as you have stated on several occasions.

you are on the ball to point out others, yet will not concede that you are not infallible as you would have us believe.

and as I've said before, if you didn't hang onto and praise every positive post, but decry every negative one, you would maybe have a bit more credibility.

and to have Aquinaga come to your defence at every opportunity, a proven fantasists, does you no favours.

Adikt. I think you wil find your posting non factual ideas again. ideas not facts.

below is from the institute of UK directors.

The nomination committee oversees and monitors board performance, succession planning, director selection, director development and the company’s diversity policy

please note the sentence I've bracketed, regarding the overview and performance of the CEO.

adikt I've no issue, other than the fact you lord it over all and sundrie with your ideas presented as facts,and when they don't add up, you try to deflect, or make up fictitious emails from Irwin and co,to try to reinforce your brainwaves.

I also have looked back on those supposed emails from Irwin. they both arrived in your mail box a day or so after you was loosing the argument on here.

I can gladly post a cut and paste of youre theories. and dates

followed by the dates a day or two later Irwin emailed you confirming your points.

Adikt, your post from December.

Mather's position is looking a bit dodgy

your post from yesterday after I pointed out facts and told youMather is now on nomination committee. and clearly not on dodgy ground.

he has had a sea change was your reply, you then tried to deflect your latest wildly postings, by telling me he has his hands full with Dgr.

and that has what to do,with another of your wild pronounsments not standing up to scrutiny.

I believe it was another poster on here who asked you last week to add up any posts you've made that actually amounted to anything.

then balance that with any that you were remotely close to getting correct

Adikt. Your complete refusal to admit, that even your elaborate theories and brainwaves, can be proven incorrect, when the facts show otherwise is amusing.

You have stated on many occasions mather has been sidelined.

He has just been shown to be a member of one of the most influential committees.

And you tell us it's because he's had a sea change.

Staggering.!!!!!!

Good morning adikt.

You appear to have missed my earlier yesterday post regarding mather.

You've often posted that mather is yesterday news, and has little or no input in the running of solg.

I'm interested if your view has changed, now that he clearly has an important position on the nomination committee.

A position where he actually chooses who he wants as directors, and I believe oversees the ceo.

It would appear that nothings changed.

I eagerly await your responce

I'm awaiting a reply adikt.

or am I to assume facts have interfered with your opinions.

after all you've posted many times that Mather has no input in solg. it's now a new regime

you've boasted.

I take it your silence, says much about your embarrasment

Bbg, correct me if I'm wrong. but did we not have similar excitement, at a site called something like "Aquinaga" many years ago

as I recall it was like the poster with a similar name. "big hat and no draws"