Member Info for needalife

Just did a rough calculation on here, appx 20 no votes

Appx 5 or 6 yes votes.

Then take into account the 25% who probably won't even bother to vote.

It's not looking to good for the no vote.

It appears you won't even get a big enough no vote from retail if that figure is representative of all retail voters.

Adik,

Are you also close to my view, with regards how institutional vote.

And on another point.

Novice, your humour goes over my thick head.

I've absolutely no idea, what your strangers post is meant to mean.

Bp1234.

I forgot to mention the legal ramifications if an institute lost money voting against the boards recommendations.

They would be covered if any disgruntled investor lost money.

By the fact they did what was recommended.

Bp.1234

In answer to your question.

Historically institutions do act in their financial interest in these situatiins,

They do this by voting the way the directors recommend.

This is because, they invariably know more than you, as to what's going on.

And can you imagine the damage to their reputation if they voted against the recommendation and as will happen with solg the sp collapses.

They safeguard themselves, their investments, and their customers by voting yes.

These are points the Rodney's,aroks, and smokers of this world, forget to mention

Rodney, don't be bloody ridiculous.

Your stories are becoming more absurd by the day

Djg.

Your wrong about funds.

Funds in the vast majority of cases vote with the directors recommendation.

You really are out of your depth old mate.

Dg.

It's a fact, that the average retail investor buys shares in a company for between $2000 to $10000. Or

£1000 to £5000 .

The amount of shares people are claiming to own on here is absurd.

It's like mass hysteria. We've got to own more than the last poster.

It's the same with shipright.

Rodney's got a solicitor

So shiprights got a corporate lawyer.

Aquinaga is mathers drinking mate

Bbg has mather on speed dial

Then dbw, had a conference call with mather.

Adik, not to be out done, had a 3 hour phone call with the new chairman.

And on, and on, and on , and on it goes

Much like

Monash.

420,000 shares.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Djg.

That's an awful lot of ifs, buts and maybes.

Do you not think, a major like jcc, have just maybe done some research and canvassing before they put the offer in.

Or we to assume that a few posters on here are smarter, and know something they don't.

Smikster.

How do you think you will make your voice heard smikster.

Please explain to me your plan.

I'm assuming you've never been to an agm or the meeting ahead of us.

Clueless

Arok your post.

"BNAmericas flags Cascabel as a globally significant copper gold asset,"

NO THEY DIDNT.

YOU MISSED OUT THE END OF THE SENTENCE.

WHERE IT CLEARLY STATES.

"ACCORDING TO THE COMPANY"

And hands up them, who don't think solg lie

you and roders need to stop bending the truth.

The rest of my post.

Note the geopolitical

I believe we havnt got the golden egg we were promised

The Chinese realise this, but are buying in for geopolitical reasons. As much as value.

My post from earlier in the month.

Good to see bnamericas read my post and agree.

Posted a week ago by me.

"my uneducated mind, I've always believed that the value of something, is what a buyer is willing to spend.

That being the case, according to Rodney, we had many majors in the data room

We've had many majors sign nda.

So we can assume most know what's for sale.

Jcc put an offer in for what they were willing to pay.

Not in my view, true value, but nonetheless what they were willing to pay.

Nobody has come forward, or appears to want to come forward with a higher offer.

So I'm assuming, nobody is willing to pay more.

Now it matters not one iota, how much Rodney , arok and co scream, or research or regurgitate."

Please read this paragraph from pbo,so link.

"Illescas told BNamericas that the Chinese company has not only evaluated the Cascabel project, but also the political and economic environment of Ecuador, and stressed that China's presence in the country responds both to the importance of minerals and to geopolitical factors, especially after the recent events in Venezuela."

It's confirming the view I posted last week.

Solg will only get what people are willing to pay.

The Chinese want solg for geopolitical reasons.

Profit from cascabel and other tenements is secondary.

And the fact nobody else is coming foreward, and indeed endorsing it.

Confirms 28p or a penny or two more is what those in the know are content with.

And any solicitor, lawyer, or Rodney or arok or smikster, should convey this message.

150 posts a day pleading for support will alter nothing

Darren, wasn't cloughie a complete drunk.

And didn't he also say the polished goal keeper was a complete clown.

And didn't that complete clown play a blinder and knock England out of the world cup.

Maybe his advice is to be taken with salt

Roders and shippy,

Not orders and shipping

Rodney's speaking to his solicitor this week

Shiprights corporate lawyer is phoning him this week.

I'm now expecting someone to tell us they've hired a barrister.

May pay you to get together orders and shipping.

Otherwise we will have more legal teams in court, than we had majors in the data room.

Solicitors

Corporate lawyers.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Shiprights got a top corporate lawyer phoning him.

🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣🤣

Mate. I would rather give someone$1000 , than do what you adik, arok, smikster, mathers finger do. Hour after hour after hour, adikt trawling through company records, mf, searching out links, arok and you, totally consumed.

I've got 13 shares in my portfolio, I would need an army to do what you fo.

WHY.

And I don't drink tinnies.

Kilkenny

And shiraz

Rodney.

Bhp.newmont, solg directors, do appear to think it's a fair price.

And that alas, is why your peeing against the wind