RE: Tibbs5 Aug 2023 18:57
Hi Daz,
Thank you for your thoughts, you are likely not aware but Cowichan is a professional geologist and I can vouch a very decent person, I have seen some of his past correspondence to Centamin which was polite and reasonable, and at least deserved some official acknowledgment, even better an answer!
Possibly some of Cowichan's questions were based-on inaccurate information , but if that were so then the company should have regarded it as an opportunity to quell rumour and state the true facts, sadly they did neither which is at the least is a missed opportunity to promote interest in the company!
i am a longer term holder of a not inconsiderably number of Centamin shares and I have a dossier of unanswered questions , three is certainly room for great improvement but since the change of PR company response to investors queries appears to bre non existent!
Do I trust what we share holders are being told, certainly not, they lied in the past why should I trust```````` them now!
Centamin is welll and truly buggered with market trust down the lavatory for good reason, the management behaved like carpet baggers and shysters upwards shareholders!
Its an end to the extra waste clearance costs with measurable proof results and a restoration above scraps level of the dividend that's needed before the share price will rise!
Until then regard the company with great suspicion and trust iit like a rattle snake in a lucky dip!
Centamin is in the "Stinker" class at present and great improvement is needed!