Member Info for MrRipley

Yap yap yap.

Also I haven’t once said anyone, specifically a novice should follow my lead. It was you who tried to get salty with your accusations about my status as a LTH and having an imaginary trading pot that exists only in your mind. You can’t read English. You can’t follow a basic sentence. Therefore conversing with you beyond this is a waste of my time. Good luck in fantasy land. Binned.

Thanks for admitting I’m didn’t say anywhere that it was a trading pot.

I literally said a number of posts ago that I wasn’t buying more than the funds I had available ergo I have the funds to cover the entire bet. I also said it can be treated the same as normal share buying if you stay within that fund (with the exception of forgoing your rights to vote). So you’ve literally just repeated what I’ve already said. Do you want to keep making a complete clown of yourself here? You’re tying yourself in knots and proving further that you can’t follow basic English.

It’s not for trading…. How’s this hard to grasp? I wanted to buy more via a spread bet. It’s the exact same as adding to a normal fund to buy more shares. Keep trying to discredit me while making yourself look a total prat, incapable of reading basic English.

The bit where he got outdone completely so reverted to claiming he was only joking was my favourite bit of him exporting his stupidity. Anyway, he’ll probably join the long list of people who don’t like me.

You weren’t though. You don’t understand what you’re commenting on because you can’t read. So you can’t possibly be a arbiter of my intelligence as you haven’t the capacity.

Imagine being as thick as you starbright….. one more time…… you do not….. have to sell shares….. in a spread bet….. to take profit. I’ll still have the exact same share equivalent until buy out etc unless I add more…………………….. it’s not hard to understand unless you’re illiterate. You only need enough in to cover your exposure. **** me. What’s your IQ? About 70 odd? Is it numbers and words you struggle with or is it a general don’t put our fingers near your mouth kind of situation?

Crowfoot simply doesn’t like me Apre and is trying to pick holes in me. It’s only curious if you haven’t read The Naked Traders guide to spread betting or considered the idea that fretting over paying CGT or hitting your ISA limit can be overcome by simply spread betting. As long as you keep within your limit, ergo 10k should be treated as you have 10k, not that you have 50k and are completely over leveraged then the level of exposure is literally identical to that of standard share ownership. So it’s only curious if you’ve got absolutely no capacity for abstract thought.

Why is it curious? When the re rate comes I can take profits without having to sell any shares. Tax free. And can be treated like a limitless ISA. What has that got to do with me being a long term holder?

Be nice if IG allowed buying again the fawkers. I’m not having that in the 2 weeks theyve been closing only that nobody has sold. No chance. So I can only imagine they’re filling for someone.

Anyway, second day bounce like old times anyone?

Definitely mate. That idiot has an agenda, clearly burnt by his investments and seems a generally nasty character. People like that will relentlessly spread FUD and mis information so it’s always good to counter it with facts. They hate facts. That’s a fact….. see what I did there?

I saw. They’re thick as ****. It’s a shame old Elon hasn’t lifted the bans yet…..

Can someone do me a solid and post this to that fcking moron Quint on Twatter. Him and his new buddy are currently banging on about phase 3 failure rates. Please can someone shut him down with this….

https://avacta.com/alastair-smith-provides-overview-of-precision-prodrug-technology-and-update-on-ava6000-clinical-trial/

We don’t need phase 3. Phase 2 is pivotal and is where AVA6k should be approved for use as a therapy.

Thanks.

Also…. They just pinged what was it…. £14m back to investors who were after more shares? Doesn’t scream we could do with a few more quid does it.

I believe LLP that the city boys have been invited because we currently don’t qualify for NASDAQ. Unless I’m mistaken…. And so we would need them to get off AIM. Beyond that yes we will need funding at some point if we are to stay independent. Licensing is an option but perhaps they’re setting out their stall early. Perhaps they also believe us to be massively undervalued and let’s be honest, they’re businessmen at the end of the day, they have a lot of options and shares in the company. Maybe they’d like them to be worth a lot more and peking the interest of the city boys is the way to go. Who knows. Anyway…. Nasdaq quals below.

“Standard No. 1: Earnings
The company must have aggregate pre-tax earnings in the prior three years of at least $11 million, in the previous two years at least $2.2 million, and no single year in the prior three years can have a net loss.
8

Standard No. 2: Capitalization With Cash Flow
The company must have a minimum aggregate cash flow of at least $27.5 million for the past three fiscal years, with no negative cash flow in any of those three years. Also, its average market capitalization over the prior 12 months must be at least $550 million, and revenues in the previous fiscal year must be $110 million, minimum.
8

Standard No. 3: Capitalization With Revenue
Companies can be removed from the cash flow requirement of the second standard if their average market capitalization over the past 12 months is at least $850 million and revenues over the prior fiscal year are at least $90 million.
8

Standard No. 4: Assets With Equity
Companies can eliminate the cash flow and revenue requirements and decrease their market capitalization requirements to $160 million if their total assets total at least $80 million and their stockholders' equity is at least $55 million.”

Are many here planning on trying to attend? If they let us in that is. If not I’ll dress up as the monopoly man and affect a hoity toity accent, dab some white powder around my nose, cover myself in enough aftershave to gas a boat load of people and kid on I’m one of the fund managers.

I know what you mean Timster. It’s becoming plain odd how undervalued we are and how disinterested the market seems in general. Maybe the caution out there in the current climate is just that great that people have to have everything including data in black and white.

A spunk trumpet!!! Ahhh hahahahaha what an horrific turn of phrase.

Agreed Timster. It’ll just be Sir Alan showing us slides of his new window blinds after he’s sold all of his shares.

“Next slide please…. As you can see we’ve gone for a robust mushroom colour scheme in our 15th en suite. But it’s only the cat that uses that one so I’m sure he doesn’t mind *snork*”

Hilarious watching his mental breakdown on Twatter. I genuinely believe it’s merchant banker. Full on jealous mode initiated.

Nothing stopping an update regarding TMAC prior to AVA6000 data. It is due Q4 also, and any movement on that front would also solidify the fact it’s clearly working.