RE: Wyndrum has definitely sold31 Dec 2022 12:21
The trend with bashing lately seems to be the set up or pre bash as I like to call it. You need a deadline or an event. Then you need to put a lot of weight on that event or it’s doomsday. You can add a caveat of “at least we have xx to fall back on…. Not as good but it’s something”. That’s to seem balanced. Examples.
Tom Winnifrith.
If they don’t release results on time that’s a massive red flag. (Event…. Deadline…. FUD complete)
Charters love it too. Set a number it has to stay above and add in a gap and if it goes to that number it’s doomed.
The latest is “when results aren’t that good in January, at least we have DX…. That should stop the SP falling too far”
You need to throw in accusations of ramping by LTH who are generally just being positive. Accuse everyone of basing their theories on nothing while basing their own negative theories on nothing. We had one recently around AVAs predecessor…. It’s brilliant really; add in a number like “it needs to be 10 times safer (whatever that means)” so there’s the target. The deadline… readout in January (even though the data will only be initial) so when it comes up as safe and effective you can say “yes but is it 10 times safer!?”….. so you see, target, date and consequence. Simple as that.