Member Info for MrHumble

Cant assure no cash raise again, prior. Is in that sort of realm too hence 12-8. Difficult to know in this one because the reserves are operating in a window of which i do not know, if that mind that total being diluted or not.

Oh look. More strings of unkown buys

'You Plonk** Rodney's

None of you seeing reserves in action? Not on L2 obviously but is there. O hara is going to get massive fund support, for obvious reasons maybe. But he will also have to give reason for numbers to print.

This is going up fast at some point , this month i would think

Right that's it. i think i communicated to whom I actually wished to

See you all in hell lads haha

GL

If you can knock out a fixed (covered) return of 50-100% % on any sell, all day every day, what good is 1000% return that cant be sold?

It is of no use to them at higher prices, esp given the history all can see.

Some think this: O Hara, Ashman etc, went mysteriously negative in a way. And this could represent them playing it down for others to get in.

No no no. You have it wrong.

Price was heading towards retail mass and minor majorities. And as I say, you cant sell something expensive.

A low price is always best for these guys.

3 months ago. Was that after a rise from the 7-10p raises floor? Which holders did he mean?

Oh i forgot a basic you can all do at home.

It is so many transactions now, too much for most to start at the beginning.

So start today. Dummy accounts tracking all transactions of all players in whatever instruments you wish. It is very informative. And ask yourselves, how is x fund, or Y person worth so many millions, yet i constantly lose or running mass losses, on at least 80% of the running balance

Now carry on. I promise you, there is a whole dark world out there watching you, and having a great laugh

I am interrupting this comedy

GLA

If any of you guys think I am speaking to you, I am not. Those around years, know the game as good as I, for sure. The pretence of being ignorant is entertaining, if not as manipulative as the underlying business going on.

Imo you will see TR1 fund interest at first. This is always a great liquidity opener, even if not a great price driver bar stoking liquidity. ANd if they are any good at the game - it will be a name you all adore. For a reason of course.

Most retail are cooked. They can never deal in the 40s/50s again. Not only would liquidity be thin, but they would also be competing for that liquidity, against a mass retail escape

Lets assume this is right. Is it then a possible game for the 30s?

Well, back to that thin liquidity issue again - because now who would buy even if no sell liquidity competition?

Fact is guys, the answer for the future is already out there. But looking at the company, is not where to find it....

And it leads us back to the initial question. As mass majority holders of the 40s (do you think opti can dump so much 50s/40s, and you not be?), you got done. You bought when it was on its way down to Job 2 - Are you holding a renewed shafting, or is the manipulation going to accidently pay any who hang around?

In the interim,. its a very basic history of manipulation.

I bet the quants know the exact game, and having some laugh watching algo range defence systems , defend what?

Let us consider the history.

Before all the main dilutions and bonds, it went to 88p one day. At this point there was really only OPTI as a prime seller. In that rise and fall, they managed to dump most of the stock. Job 1 done

After OPTI announced the selling around the 50s i think, it started to work its way down. OPTI selling on the up and down. Remember, they got to do all this before the main dilutions came along.

By the time OPTI had it down from circa 46% to circa 10% (approx), price was now in single digits, and in all that time, even croda talk could not lift it prior.

Then came along the raises and bonds:

Suddenly, miraculously, it was able to climb again. REMEMBER, retail are average holders in the 40s at this point. Suddenly around 17p it was able to do two mega spikes to 27 - more selling. And yet another cash raise called, 17p

In all this time you see a book that cant be explained seemingly, and assume all larger executions are buys. Even though going on for years.

You look at the books and realise, that price is only able to move up or down pre/post raises on standard liquidity. But larger executions can go on forever in x range

You then possibly say to yourself, well, if they are all buying or selling the same price - it cant move?

No no. this is not a fact at all.

But i wait to see if anyone can nail it

It seems to me you are all getting shafted. What you are probably trying to discern, is if that shafting will pay you or not one day, if wiling to hold out.

As holders I am surprised you all have the full book since inception, i guess - understand how it's liquidity and drive works, yet not called a regulatory body to explain it you.

Moral of the story

Winners sell up and move on

Losers will be forever talking about takeovers

So when can a spike be expected?

Well, i know a few who specialise in that. First thing they look for is current liquidity being so bad, cant even find buyers at lowest prices anymore

At that stage, a new liquidity market must be created - its when most spikes occur - when the liquidity ration is usually below x

And on goes the merry-go-round again.

Another batch of new gerbils caught, on the forums all day, telling everyone its great

Wonderful system . Free marketing via victims.

Only in markets - only in markets.

There are 2 exceptions to this rule of thumb

1. It's never done a big rise prior (always be a first one).

2. Granted, once every millennia, there is an exception, but it's mostly in tech etc anyway