Ive tried to tell every one this fact many times but the bunkre Luvvies just won't have it. The power should be in our hands to get rid of some of these guys..
Actually I'm amazed how few shares they have - Mazaria only has just over 3x as many as I have which is absurd Stang onlt has twice my number of shares they are not exactly mega-committed !!
Frankly I am surprised people are even still posting stuff on the board about this company ! I also cannot understand how Idiens keeps this going and keeps his salary rolling in. This must surely be one of the most feeble and **** poor AIM stock.
What worries me is this is the 3rd AIM share I have held that had a name change. I think this is mostly done to hide the past price/performance of the share despite the usual bo&&*^x the boards always come up with.
for this share, I'd say the patient is on the critical list it seems. Next to no volume, no news or input from the fat-cat BOD...They have had your cash and spent it in the Aston Martin dealers and seafood restaurants of Jersey !
I wouldn't see this as a massive drawback, there are plenty of examples of a Sprat buying a Mackrel I have worked for 2 tech companies that this happened to albeit on a slightly smaller scale than SHP..
I think there is a lot of truth in this, I cant really see that these trade volumes would be a PI, I think it is inter-MM trading, I assume this is legal ?