RE: PREM...6 Apr 2020 13:05
haha sorry it was meant to mean 0.06p . I totally agree with you, but if you weighed in the dilution and how many times hes gone out to the market/funding from that 5 year high, that must have some detriment when we are talking about value and been down in %? That's what i meant when i said the 98%, even if i have explained myself poorly. Sorry