Adam Davidson, CEO of Trident Royalties, discusses offtake milestones and catalysts to boost FY24. Watch the video here.
Not much happening here. Colin must be busy creating value.
What I'm saying stas is we are stll at initially assessment stage. I am currently involed in a nwnf. Mr Cotter will need kings councel opinion before we get a yes or no and insurance. My opinion is we are paying for an initial case assesment and nothing more. We are just hopeful of having a case and may loose our fee if we haven't.
Thanks also for all you work /research and time you have put in. Much appreciated.
Ryan
I agree with a lot of your points however I honestly believe it is best for cag if the results are known before moving forward. This way all copl holders past and present are as one. I do find it unusual that fees for councel are being asked for. My knowledge of nwnf is that the case is assessed by the lawyer to which there will be a fee based on time/complexity. After that the Nwnf contract is offered if there are resonable chances of success. Usually at 25% of compensation plus all costs which should be retrieved from the other side if successful. Mr Cotter it seems to me wants kings councel opinion at home and Canada to assess the case. If it comes back at 50/50 this case wont get off the ground unless there is pre court deal we also would not be indemnified against losses. We could loose our money again here but we must go for it.
I cant see if this takeover went ahead it would make any difference to us.
Link didnt work so heres copy
CMS has confirmed that it has dismissed one of its partners, which the Solicitors Regulation Authority (SRA) has now been alerted about.
Partner Joel Barry has been sacked, with CMS saying in a statement: “We can confirm that a partner has been asked to leave the firm and will not be commenting further.”
A former partner at legacy Olswang, Barry took over from Paul Stevens as head of IP before the three-way tie up with CMS and Nabarro. The role is currently occupied by Tom Scourfield.
An SRA spokesperson said: “Now that we are aware, we will look at all relevant information before deciding on any next steps.”
No win no fee solicitors need to be insured. If the judge decides against the cag then someone needs to pick up the costs for both sides. That comes from the solicitors indenity insurance not the solicitor. This is why only strong cases get to be fought on a no win basis. If your not. 60% plus of winning then forget it.
This case will be binned if its not insured.