Member Info for MoneyRaiser

Cowbridge the 5.5p fundraise itself wasn’t done at a discount when it was originally agreed. The RNS at the time confirmed the raise at 5.5p, which was broadly in line with where the shares were trading…The reason those shares appear to be coming through now at what looks like a discount is simply because there has been a delay between the original fundraising agreement and the shares actually being issued/admitted. Since the share price has moved in the meantime, it gives the impression they were issued cheaply today, but the pricing was actually set earlier when the raise was done..So it’s really just timing of the issuance rather than management suddenly raising money below market.

Great post Tom just added what a gift

Looks like one of the successes of aquis….similar to Ajax both multibagged and will continue to multibag……glad I got in here before both here and Ajax my biggest holdings….gl

Great write up TF surprised not higher we should be 10p+

Https://www.aquis.eu/stock-exchange/announcements/5619533

Bubblebutt and Anusol repeating the same nonsense every day unemployed pathetic losers who lost money 5 years ago and just can’t let it go……..If Trafigura wanted control, they could already have it.….The loan is secured directly against Saltfleetby. Angus has missed capital repayments. That gives Trafigura the clear legal right to enforce…..They haven’t. Not last month. Not six months ago. Not over the past year. Instead, we have an RNS — which, by law, must be accurate — stating that “positive discussions with its creditors regarding restructuring of its debt remain ongoing.” The boilerplate downside wording is standard legal cover, not evidence of failure.….More importantly, we have a named quote from the Finance Director saying: “We are also encouraged by progress being made in our discussions with creditors on the financial restructuring.” FDs don’t stick their necks out publicly for fun. They sit at the centre of any restructuring and are personally exposed if statements are misleading. If talks weren’t genuinely progressing, that quote wouldn’t exist — and it certainly wouldn’t have his name on it…. I reckon they have a solution that’s nearing completion.…So yes, capital repayments were missed — we were told that.….No, there is no evidence of interest default, enforcement action, or some covert takeover plan.….If this was terminal, Trafigura wouldn’t be funding workovers and sitting on its hands. It would have enforced already.….Bubblebutt and anusol and headinhisarse will be here in a decade time repeating same nonsense all because they lost money in Angus

News coming soon I think…..think good drilling results

Back to 10p

Bubblebutt you’re the lozer posting here every day for past 5 years because you lost money on the back of poor trading decisions :)

Standard deramping from Mirasol and bubblebutt…..this RNS was never about declaring a permanent new baseline or pretending Saltfleetby has decades left it was about demonstrating that the wells were constrained and that low-cost, standard interventions can unlock meaningful incremental production……a 30% uplift from routine perforation clean-up and acid/solvent work is not marketing fluff — it is operational evidence that the asset still responds without heavy capex. The cautious wording around flowback and monitoring is exactly what you would expect from a company that understands regulatory discipline, not something trying to oversell a spike.

The repeated flowback/liquids argument is being overplayed. Flowback can inflate short-term rates, but it does not explain a coherent field-level response unless there was genuine near-wellbore impairment beforehand. Nor does it negate the point of the intervention: improving cash generation now, at minimal cost. Arguments about “twilight years” and Theddlethorpe are lazy analogies. This strategy is explicitly about maximising cash extraction with constrained spend, not pouring capital into diminishing returns. Whether the uplift moderates is secondary to the fact that the asset has proven it can still be optimised cheaply……On the finance side, the obsession with how long restructuring has taken misses the signal. If creditors wanted the asset, they would already have enforced especially after a missed instalment…Instead, discussions are ongoing and described as positive, with Saltfleetby clearly positioned as the underpinning cash engine. The going-concern wording is standard, mandatory language; the continued engagement is what matters. Historic cash burn reflects past distractions and poor capital allocation, not the current, narrowed focus. This RNS does what it needs to do: it strengthens the operational case for Saltfleetby and materially improves the company’s hand in negotiations, without pretending risks don’t exist.

Share price up 8%

For the avoidance of doubt, a technical default is not the same as an operational or financial default. It’s an administrative, typically notice-related issue, and is routinely cured with no implication of insolvency, asset impairment, or project failure….If the Trafigura funding is resolved, all of this noise becomes irrelevant very quickly…..HIY ARSE…. for the AI obsession — that’s flattering, but misplaced. Some of us just write clearly. You might try worrying less about tone and about wasting your time when the company comes out of suspension and goes back up :)

Bubblepoint,…No need for the theatrics or the revisionism. You’ve now cycled through sold everything, sold most, tiny punt, bog paper anyway — whichever version fits the post you’re writing at the time….If you genuinely exited cleanly at 1.7p, then your continued obsession with defending it, explaining it, and repeatedly telling everyone how little you lost is… curious. People who made good exits usually move on….As for “technical default” and missed deadlines — those are facts, not insults. They stand regardless of whether you’re still emotionally invested or not…..Anyway, good luck with the beer money. The market will decide who read this situation properly.

Bubblepoint don’t lie you were one of those simps trying to claw back their money in that action group LOL

This will be the best stock in my portfolio of 2026….imo

We’ll see in a month where the price is and then you can decide if whether I was right or wrong……I won’t post till then here then…ok?

There will be a war eventually and when there is gas prices will fly…..especially as Iran will close the strait of Hormuz

Understood. Here it is with the …… explicitly used as a continuation link into the next paragraph.

This drop is about UK gas prices, not Angus Energy as a business. Commodity prices have pulled back across the sector, dragging sentiment with them. That is macro, not company-specific.……Angus is a domestic gas producer, not a leveraged bet on geopolitics. Lower prices reduce upside temporarily; higher prices increase cash flow. That is how every commodity producer operates.

……Quoting percentage moves in a small-cap AIM stock proves nothing. Liquidity and weak hands drive volatility, not asset quality or operational reality.……Missing a Balcombe notice deadline does not mean planning consent is lost. The approval runs to February 2026. Administrative timing is not asset destruction.……Gas prices move. Sentiment moves. Angus’ assets, permits, and production strategy do not. That distinction matters.

Https://www.reuters.com/business/gold-silver-climb-us-yields-fall-softer-retail-sales-2026-02-11/

Trust me…..IMO Haywood will run this company into the ground and restart elsewhere he’s very incompetent…..dyor