Member Info for Moab

The AGM and subsequent Q&A could well be another complete turkey.

Carrot

This is, quite simply, a silly comparison, and even you should know this. Why do you peddle this cr*p?

Swazer

Today at 13:10 you wrote:

"@moab, again, what are your specific arguments? You do not have any except personal attacks."

And so, at 18.57 a personal attack to follow up your personal attack on this guy that I quoted.

I nothing about your self-proclaimed stock picking ability and care even less.

Swazer

Let me quote you on the subject of personal attacks: Remember this rant?

"@Iknownuffin The deramper and short seller of the decade award goes to this knob. 6.5k posts of poison.

Go and get F#cked. I have called more winners than you could dream of. Including #ECR, multiple times this year. My track record speaks for itself.

Shows how weak you are attempting to drag up none stories about me from half a decade ago. Standard operating procedure for a lying coward like you.

You are a typical toxic anonymous troll bell-end, infact you're most likely an algorithm or you are working for an utter sc#m bag P&D groups, who have spread bets across the #AIM, shorting and destroying the value of UK firms.

You make me sick!!!

#ECR Is bullish on the charts. The technicals look good. You can go and get absolutely f#cked!!! https://x.com/SwazersC/status/1844784854061187217 When the market makes a spike up it's gonna take all the shorts out in one fail swoop. Your positions will be closed."

You are truly disingenuous and selective in your comments, it may be a basic comprehension problem, or as it is fashionably called 'backwards logic' .

I have no problem with Engsolve trading, my point is that PHE is not trading in any valid sense, and I wonder if Eng has taken its eye off the ball wrt PHE.

Now, try and twist this statement, or get AI to do it for you.

Swazer

You have a short memory for your own late night paranoid and offensive rants. I limit myself to facts. Please continue with your AI generated self justifying space fillers. We are, as ever, all agog at your wisdom.

Dusty

I don't care how long HUI's new chums have been around; they are trading, and PHE is not. I think Engsolve have taken their eye off PHE, and it is mouldering in the long grass.

Why, indeed are there buyers this morning?

Does anyone have Newlands email? Some one should tell him to do the decent thing.

We will be picked up for peanuts out of receivership, despite Carrot's best efforts.

Rats, sinking ship etc,.

Testpack

Well well, I wondered a year or more back if the troll finder general (aka Swazer) and the phoney PhD were one and the same fraud. You seem to have nailed it.

His tune has changed since he discovered AI, but the same self righteous cr*p.

8 of last 12 posts have been by the Carrot repeating himself endlessly. No insight whatsoever, or is it narcissism?

If anyone can be bothered to look, see my post of 2 Aug 2024 17:45.

A real, and unavoidable problem for Parsortix is that it only finds CTCs when they exist ! That is, when the original tumour starts to metastasise. Even when metastasis is occurring, CTCs are not guaranteed, as was shown in a paper I quoted many months back. So, for early detection of a primary, ctDNA, with all its drawbacks and lack of detail, remains the best option. This will be helped increasingly by use of AI. So the joint approach, of using CTcs and DNA analysis improves the quality of info obtained, but the CTC s are never guaranteed, and that is the fundamental weakness of Parsortix. So I fear it will remain a pharma based tool used in the development of new therapy rather than a clinical tool.

As a LTH I hate to have to say this!

I think the inept AN invited the analysts along yesterday just to show them and the world that AFC has been f*ucked on his watch. God, even Carrot thinks so. Someone needs to come and save this car crash from AN; so much potential is being destroyed.

Patx

Agreed. I worry that we have heard nothing on the DMG of any substance since the abortive CMD. Does it work satisfactorily in its present configuration? How long has it been run for without problem? What feedstocks have been tested and with what outcomes? And lots of other questions.

Just what was the point of all the hoopla over a CMD at some whizzy place in the city? BB reduced target by 25%. Was anyone impressed? AGL cannot even find someone to put it out of its misery. For once I agree with Carrot that AZ or other pharma could have AGL for SFA, and one has to speculate why this has not happened. Perhaps in a month or two pharma will have AGL for even less. I have given up all hope of a better outcome.

Apart from the SP being down 23% there seems to be nothing much else to say about todays results. Nothing concrete to look forward to, just the usual crap about 'advanced talks' etc,.

If anyone can polish a turd it is old smoke and mirrors himself.

K£VMC

How about a quick summary for those not attending, please