RE: Middle Eastern Sovereign Fund5 Feb 2025 20:43
I’d have been surprised if they would have been able to use all of that. Look how much the creditors amount to and there’s the issue of the CLN that’s was due in January. Fat chance the previous leadership would have achieved agreement of the CLN holders to do what’s necessary when the leadership they had put their faith in had seemingly killed the company. And could the creditors have been kept happy considering their debts owed to them with Shishir Poddar still at the helm? Unlikely. So actually your point is moot, Saluc as that sovereign fund money would have been out the door as soon as it arrived and the company would be needing more money and in an even worse position again in a month’s time. Receiving that money probably would have resulted in the fund not getting its material delivered and the company put even further at risk, the company was already $1.2m behind on deliveries from the RNS.
Good going by the new board in tough circumstances: the company has a path forward, and has taken some hard decisions, and now conflicts of interest are seemingly all but removed. Hopefully the service provider does not continue to act as badly as it has by the sound of it (that answers the question on the delayed accounts, wtf!).