Member Info for MIKECC

As a LTH I was always uncomfortable with JP's extraordinary hype. When I saw Winnifrith's reference to spinning plates this chimed with what my common sense was already telling me, so I got out in the 40s. That same common sense now tells me that what Sound have must be worth a lot more than8p. One way or another, I am convinced this will end up significantly higher than it is now.DYOR

I seem to recall that quite a while ago JP was reported to have said I have already had an offer of 50m, but that would do nothing for Sound. .Was that before or after we had TE5 as an asset?

In the following paper it says (P6)NH3 can be burned directly in an ICE. How come? NH3 is surely not combustible in air? Anyone explain please?

https://www.energy.gov/sites/prod/files/2015/01/f19/fcto_nh3_h2_storage_white_paper_2006.pdf

I understand the UK is to massively increase the number of wind turbines. These will intermittently generate vast amounts of surplus energy. Fast response lectrolysis would seem to be the perfect mechanism to capture this. As an ITM shareholder, I like it!

\what were the longevity figures given ? Thanks.

Sorry for my ignorance of such matters. But why would a buyer offer more than he could buy up the shares in the market? eg.Currently around 11p?

I asked myself also why not use H2 to directly fuel an internal combustion engine. I understand that when H2 is burned at high temperatures it results in the production of polluting nitrogen oxides. Presumably from the oxygen and nitrogen in the atmosphere. Would be interesting to hear from someone with proper knowledge. There is also the question of poor engine efficiency.

Reading this board, one thing is clear: A great many of us have been into huge paper profits, myself included, and then failed to take them. So whose fault is that? We should have reminded ourselves that if it sounds too good to be true... etc .No good blaming anyone else. I'm afraid

Am I not right in saying that Schlum increased their risk at Sound with the current arrangement? Are they as gullible as us? I doubt it. So why are they staying?

lONGWAIT..I was just working from memory, I see it It was 60p, Quite a difference. But you will agree that it still makes my point. . If I come unstuck here at Sound, I will make sure it is as a result of my own misjudgement. That's a bit less painful. JP has always said high reward high risk.is what he is into.

I I have learned never to be swayed by what others think, especially the 'experts'. e.g. I was in Ocado at 40p, but sold because Ocado was ridiculed by the experts and the markets. Now look at them.JP is right when he said he says the daily SP is not what matters, it is progress towards our end goal. .And that seems to be heading in the right direction..

Schlum clearly think so, And they are no mugs.

Just as a guide, say the typical size of the 7 so far.

To put this in perspective, what is the value of an order for an H2 refuelling station ?

How do you burn ammonia? Spark ignition seems to indicate in an internal combustion engine. Or what? I can see the appeal of NH3 for transporting and storing hydrogen, as it is easily liquified at comparatively low pressure and does not 'normaly' burn in air , my basic chemistry tells me. Sounds a great option .And how is the NH3 eventually split to recover the hydrogen?

Regarding JP's share plan as per RNS 26 April., will any share transactions effected within this plan be announced as director's share dealings in the usual Way?

Is the opportunity pipeline invitations already received to tender? Or something else ?

TheToyota Mirai is designated as a hybrid. Does the 'Hybrid' irefer to a combination of an internal combustion engine and an electric motor, or a combination of fuel cell and battery ? If the former, is the ICE burning H2.? Thanks.

Thanks for those enlightening replies.

among applications for their product range ITM mention using H2 in methanation processes for the production of methane. But why would anyone want o use methane when they already have H2, the perfect green fuel . Am I missing something here ?.