The next focusIR Investor Webinar takes places on 14th May with guest speakers from Blue Whale Growth Fund, Taseko Mines, Kavango Resources and CQS Natural Resources fund. Please register here.
Maxwell have already tried to find that tiniest chink without success .i .e.the judge has repeatedly denied their arguments. Why would they expect to succeed now? More likely they will be planning an advantageous(to them) settlement.
I find it difficult to believe that Maxwell will go to trial when every argument they have presented so far has been denied by the judge, again and again.I presume the judge's role will include giving guidance to the jury, guidance that will surely be consistent with .the denials already in place.
Return on capital employed (ROCE) is 44% +. That is some performance.
every aspect of Maxwell's defence, as so far presented, has been firmly rejected by the judge, with detailed reasons. So . If the case goes to trial. only something completely new from Maxwell will win the Judge's support when giving guidance to the jury. Not a bad position to be in at this late stage.
udge's support.
in an earlier motion for summary dismissal, Maxwell tried a number of arguments, all of which were dismissed by the judge . who went through them in detail. Does anyone know when the present motion for summary dismissal is due for a decision?
Maxwell may well believe they are right, but they have so far not been able to come up with anything that has convinced the judge. , who has denied their attempts to have the case thrown out and and described our case as 'plausible' . Unless Maxwell have something new up their sleeve, it seems reasonable to expect the judge to maintain this view at the trial.
Found this: Grayson Sundermeir’s practice focuses on complex patent litigation. His experience spans all aspects of pre-litigation diligence and litigation, including fact and expert discovery, settlement strategy, and trial. Grayson’s practice has emphasis on life sciences and biotech litigation, and encompasses industries as diverse as oil and gas, polymer chemistry, pharmaceuticals, medical devices, and automotive/transportation.
Prior to his legal career, Grayson worked in pro
Where do yoy see the RSI? Thanks
The judge has previously denied a Maxwell motion to dismiss CPX'S claim. which she described as 'plausible' . Which seems to confirm that a good job has been done in presenting our case. As we approach the wire, the chances of Maxwell finding a killer blow in their locker become increasingly unlikely. Let's hope so, anyway.
What we know as FACT is (a) Maxwell have failed to discover prior art and (b(The judge has previously denied Maxwell's motion to dismiss the case for the reason that: " CAP-XX has plausibly alleged direct infringement of claims 1, 13, and 51 of the #034 patent and claim 1 of the #600 patent."
With the product range cpx have they should be storming ahead. When I did my initial DYOR years ago, , I came across this broker comment: " There can be no doubt that this is not a well run company." Nothing has changed, and apparently nor will it. There is now a total lack of confidence in the BOD, whose updates have become meaningless.