Charles Jillings, CEO of Utilico, energized by strong economic momentum across Latin America. Watch the video here.
Note pages 19 and 20, active court action against them. Quite the list. Most are recent.
CCAA Filings RNS'd, Bradbury's Affidavit is an interesting read:
https://www.rns-pdf.londonstockexchange.com/rns/4072R_2-2023-2-28.pdf
Someone had previously posted some SP Angel notes about some recent RNSs, any new publications about today's one? Where can one check?
>We were all hoping for £1 a share a year ago. Even factoring in debt and the needed investment in the mine this should be worth far more in a sale than the 5p share price trading was halted at.
Agree. I was actually quite pessimistic up until today, but now less so. Am I the only one? I also find it interesting it reads like they are selling the whole thing, as opposed to, say, just Little Dear, or even just a portion of it (intentional typo as a homage to moon).
A delist doesn't mean your shares disappear, though. We are already in a position of not being able to trade.
>I then expect them to initiate an SISP.
Well done sir, you called it.
>They all know each other, and there's likely dodgy dealings going on to basically steal the company from us.
Small community up there, reckon they have some Eyes Wide Shut type parties?
Letters p and t are quite close in the alphabet, yet there is quite the difference between leadership and that other word.
>He was ramping this like mad over the summer and then released THAT RNS in early September instead of doing a 20p placing to generate cash. That's before you even get into what has happened since then.
Not to mention not a single time showing his face through this whole ordeal, either through informal virtual Q&As, or even just video interviews with some platforms. No explanation given to supplement the often curt and confusing RNSs since summer at what have clearly been very turbulent times for the mine.
>They must also believe there is still value on the assets as this has been secured against the assets!
What else would they secure it against? Bradbury's pinky promise?
>best time ever
It certainly is, just not for PIs :-) PIs are being made to PIs(s) off
>Finance department under Eason Chen completely failed to keep track of the financial situation.
Had a thought the other day whether the appointment of that lady was scripted and pre-meditated as well, so Chen can do his bidding, and then the new CFO can come in and claim ignorance should there be any legal consequences.
Nice find! Wonder what the 'or else' part is to the conditions of 10 business days to cure default. Guess we will have more news by end of week.
Yes, you don't need to be under one legal entity. Similarly, multiple large corporate entity stakeholders can join to vote in concert on something.
Alternative if doesn't work
https://discord.gg/BpUZZDhRg7
Is this how we find out Strummer doesn't hold the shares he said he did, and he just made things up in a pee-pee measuring contest with djcryin?
Your left.
Yes, yes, you're the 6'4 ex-rugby centre, give me that copy-pasta of yours. It makes you look pathetic that you can't age gracefully and still hold on to something from the past. Something that doesn't give you anything at all.
Hey look, you are contributing to that thing you hate about 'that makes forums pointless to read. '
I am clever for pointing out your lapses in critical thinking, yes.
And here you are, busy man, wasting your time in petty arguments.
Your holier than thou attitude reeks across the entire Internet.