Research is overwhelmingly positive imo14 Nov 2025 13:08
If you look at everything we know so far, Juno is actually sitting in a much stronger position than most exploration plays. Both holes hit every sequence they were supposed to, the geophysics lines up perfectly across multiple datasets, and GEO are already planning follow-up drilling before assays even land – you don’t do that unless the visuals back up the model. Add in the fact that this is an IRGS/IOCG-style target (which statistically has a higher chance of hosting metal), plus the size of the anomaly and Baxter’s experience, and the overall picture is pretty encouraging.
Roughly speaking, Juno has around a 60% chance of being a genuine intrusive mineral system worth growing, and around a 30% chance that these first assays show something positive. Those are very strong odds in exploration terms, especially for a tiny AIM company. Nothing guaranteed of course, but the risk/reward here is far better than most early-stage drill plays.