Member Info for Mick_OC

Patience my @rse

Unless of course they take a month or two to digest the responses and then ask for further input from bodies such as RVV/NAA

thanks!

which interview?

apart from this: "Work on the Scoping Study has been slowed down, while the Company waits for clarity from the Government on what happens next in the process."

"Work on the Scoping Study has been slowed down, while the Company waits for clarity from the Government on what happens next in the process." no news re that then :(

brom, my guess is same has today, see no reason for it being higher as no news apart from the scoping study. Lack of humour? Looking at the weather app to check so I just asked Siri: "Surely its not going to snow again today?" It replied, "it is, and don't call me Shirley!" Forgotten to take my phone off Airplane mode..

expect one from Kurt outlining timeline for Gov decision. Not sure when we will see it but hopefully some time in March.

Sometimes a little time out from these boards is a good thing pal, I do not doubt your holding and wish you well whatever you decide to do with it. Stock boards can take over your life, we have all been here for many years, most have not made a penny with this stock, if you are in a postion to make a few bob and leave some to your family then good for you, go for it.

https://investingnews.com/daily/resource-investing/critical-metals-investing/graphite-investing/graphite-outlook/

http://www.netfonds.no/quotes/ppaper.php?paper=BEO-SDB.NGM

cheers, nice to see progress in other areas of the business

You are very welcome aug

Reliant Robin

I've just got a new car for my missus. Reasonable swap I thought.

http://sverigesradio.se/sida/artikel.aspx?programid=2327&artikel=6885968 The Left Party's Former Victor Segerstr�m, who is in coalition with the Social Democrats in Jokkmokk, is standing between the miners and the miners In Jokkmokk, the Social Democrats council council Robert Bernhardsson has now responded to the government's request for the municipality's views on a mine in G�llok. This has led to criticism from the opposition. The environmental party is critical that the matter was not raised in the municipal council. The Environmental Party has therefore sent a letter to the government regarding the request to submit a second referral, where the opposition's view would appear. In the current referral to the government, the municipal council Robert Bernhardsson writes, among other things, that only one of Jokkmokk's surface would be used for mining and that the world heritage Laponia should not stop mining as it is as far from, for example, the ore mine's mine to Laponia as it is between G�llok to World limit. The Left Party's Former Viktor Segerstr�m, who is in coalition with the Social Democrats in Jokkmokk, is standing between the miners and the miners "You should neither lap for or against a mine," says Viktor Segerstr�m. How should you interpret it? - Just as I say. You should not advocate exploitations. And you should not work out chances for jobs either. You should try to have some kind of balance where you do not spoil anyone more than anyone else, "says Viktor Segerstr�m.

Many have gone to the environmental party's bluff, they have been fooled by their description where the shelter lies, there are many who believe that Kallak is in a forest area, and that's not true, it's used forest since 100 years," said Robert Bernhardsson. According to Bernhardsson, the world heritage Laponia is well-absorbed in space so that you can work with establishments outside the world heritage. Bernhardsson does not see that Laponia should be an obstacle to any other establishment. "We are very constructive and work with local growth and jobs, the Environment Party works out of difficulty and feels it's the way forward," says Bernhardsson.

Now the municipal council, Robert Bernhardsson, answers the criticisms of the municipality's referral to the government regarding mining in G�llok. The political majority in Jokkmokk wants a mine in G�llok and prefers it in a referral to the government. Criticism from the municipality's third largest party, the Environmental Party is sharp because it is considered that the matter should have been dealt with by the municipal government first. But the Social Democratic Council of Commons Robert Bernhardsson contradicts the Environmental Party. "You risk Jokkmok's future when you measure Jokkmokk as a place where no one else is accommodated, but of course there are more people," says Bernhardsson to Sameradion & SVT S�pmi. In his criticism, the Environment Party's Henrik Blind has emphasized that reindeer husbands also contribute to municipal welfare, but now they will be sacrificed at the municipal altar for the "real" jobs. Blind thinks instead that the political majority should lift his eyes and begin to realize that Jokkmokk does not need any mines, but rather sustainable jobs. But the municipality council, Robert Bernhardsson, who wrote the opinion of the municipality, thinks the environmental party is wrong and actually raises its eyes. "We work very forward-looking. What separates the Social Democrats from the environmental party is that we see that the number of jobs is very important for Jokkmokks Municipality, and we need to work constructively to create more jobs in Jokkmokk, says Bernhardsson, adding: "It's the environmental party that placed us in this union where everything should be put together. I think that is very nasty. Bernhardsson argues that it is unfortunate that labor in Jokkmokk, which lost 41 percent of its population since 1968, is unfortunate. There were 8720 people in the municipality now 5105 people live in Jokkmokk (2016). Bernhardsson thinks that more industries are in Jokkmokk and he emphasizes the importance of getting more in working age to the municipality. - This gives jobs and these belong in the municipality together with existing jobs. It is not particularly shrewd to oppose each other. Of course, one can find a good solution for everyone. Bernhardsson says that the mine generates a few hundred jobs and it means he is important to Jokkmokk. In addition, Bernhardsson thinks that the Environmental Party is trying to trick people when it comes to the planned mining's geographical location. He says that political representatives, national and international, believe that Kallak is located within Laponia's world heritage, although it is not so according to him. "Many have gone to the environmental party's bluff, they have been fooled by their description where the shelter lies, there are many who believe that Kallak is in a forest area, and that's not true, it's used forest since 100 years," said

Thanks Andy: The environmental party rages: "Run solorace" Jokkmokk The environmental party rages against Jokkmokks municipal council. Jonny Vikstr�m 08:14 | 2018-02-13 This is because the opposition in the municipal council has not participated in the supplementary statement to the government regarding a mine in Kallak. - There seems to be no interest in respecting democratic rules of the game. I've lost the bill of how many times the management ran solorace, "says Henrik Blind (MP), member of the municipal government, and mentions the first opinion to the government about Kallak and the opinion on Laponiatjuottjudus as an example. Read more: Map Jokkmokks trump card for mining The latest addition was submitted in early February. "We had a working committee in the municipal council a few days before that. Then it should have been on the agenda. It is a fundamental issue. Now it seems that the whole Jokkmokk feels like this, when the opposition did not have the opportunity to make claims and reservations that followed with the Ministry of Food. That's serious, says Blind. The view, including the map with the fyramil radius to Laponia, does not give much to him. "Nowhere is the perspective of how the mining and tourism industry is affected by a mine. And with the map, he plays the cards in total. Kallak is about a single cohabitation, J�hk�gaska, cut off by a mine. "I think Henrik Blind is making big words. It is widely known what the Jokkmokk environmental party likes a mining establishment, no need to hover in uncertainty. What I know, the Environment Party has reserved both against our first opinion on Kallak and the opinion on Laponiatjuottjudus. In terms of more perspectives, they are included in the original opinion, says the municipal council Robert Bernhardsson (S).

I've translated the email which can be viewed here: https://docs.google.com/document/d/1MuAMsU2w15lFWyHLpVRr0c5UZQOPnr-23t0AJuzNvCg/edit?usp=sharing