RE: Missing trade data30 Nov 2020 17:43
Sense.....I think I speak for most on this board when I say that I appreciate the efforts you put in to argue the Company point of view against the doubters and those with diametrically opposite agendas.
The majority of posters want the Company to succeed and in many cases have invested hard earned cash, as I have done, believing the business model, its potential and the very salient point that if they do, it will be beneficial to the planet and the air we all share. I will not directly criticise XPB and the like as its a free country and everyone is entitled to their opinion. However, as you've taken up the gauntlet, I and many others besides, appreciate the hard work you put in.
So to the dual listing idea....Im not qualified to post on the subject but the small amount of research I've done would suggest that the rules for inclusion in the US are quite stringent and the parameters would not be met by the Company as it stands. Whether there's an equivalent to AIM, I'm not sure. I'm sure somebody else will though.
As for the recent appointment....as far as I can see this is a new position and not a replacement of another. Bearing in mind the Compamy is reliant capital raised from Sharehllders to exist at the moment.....they would find it immensely difficult to justify such an appointment if they ultimately nothing good to report. Being the eternal optimist, I can only see this move as very positive. Thoughts?