Member Info for MH01

It’s in the name…. Mumbo Jumbo. New name on the board and disrupting off the bat.

Ever since the 5% RNS was announced this has been a daily discussion. Nothing new raised today. We all share the same concern, shareholders want shares to be worth lots of money. We want to see new all time highs. As Paddy said, long term holders will hold their nerve and follow their conviction by holding through the ups and downs. True value will be immense once the decision to mine is approved, and production of gold ore is imminent. Not long for a long term holder to wait now.

Very “useful” Mumbo… “I’m looking to invest, but I want to pick the bottom.” Okay mate. If you believe in GGP you buy, it’s simple. Expecting to pick bottoms and tops is for dreamers.

So you’re guaranteeing returns now?

Buy GGP.

Comedy gold, thanks Eric, I needed a good chuckle !

Go back and listen to the AGM Q&A

OzAu I’m sad to read that you’re disappointed. Thought and prayers sent your way.

New investors looking to enter. Long term investors looking to add to their holdings. Christmas gift prices.

He seems desperate doesn’t he, writing long winded rants to talk down GGP in a bid to look plausible and smart. As opposed to Eric who just makes useless posts in his bid to talk GGP down. Both claim to be highly intelligent men that we should all bow our heads too. Makes you wonder who these people are that spend their time writing on boards they don’t own shares in. Their motives are clear as Day.

The RNS states the process

Do you even understand what the process is for a company to release a resource figure of inferred, indicated etc? It’s called infill drilling! And a lot of it is needed. Without it no company in their right mind should be quoting resource numbers without the data to back it up. So please stop this nonsense.

Make your own judgements about GGP and decide for yourself what you want to do. That’s what anyone else here is doing when they quote numbers not released by NCM GGP.

So you want “insider trading” to be legitimised?

The PwC document does not state 75% equals control. The example in section 6 is specific to that example that 75% is needed between 3 parties, for that example. Irrelevant for GGP and NCM.

You do no research and rely upon strangers in the internet for information. Over 50% is control of anything, pure and simple.

I don’t understand your post. NCM already have “control” since they own greater than 50%.

Bank loan will be next

Buy LOW….. sell HIGH

So buy at today’s price if you believe GGP is undervalued. Easy money then right?

Simple reply. 5% of Havieron. Not 5% of GGP.