Sapan Gai, CCO at Sovereign Metals, discusses their superior graphite test results. Watch the video here.
Ah Jilson - as always you twist the context.
That was in relation to the £3.1m cash balance that you and your SP mates said would be more like £1m.
I stand by my statement - very well run ship and very tight cost control indeed. Well done Bidstack.
Wilinus - 39 pages of posting history - plenty of links to TW on Jilson's history. Protecting a fellow poster. Untangle this knot of deceit.
No doesn't matter at all - it's not like he's part of a website set up to de-ramp shares if they don't pay protection money.
What is and has been happening is very co-ordinated and organised. Glad to see a strong co-ordinated resistance.
Wilnius who is next? TheChancers? Helx? Jilson? Sygne? 4 birds in one there if you target them.
Passed the psychometric test to be a ************* reporter though.
TW: Can you spell four words? NS: Course! F. o. r. w. a. r. d. s. TW: Your (sic) in!
Pretty disgraceful if true. Why are you on here Nigel? Thought you were fighting for more transparency and more regulation and less market manipulation on AIM.
Your posting history is pretty telling. Ex MM, joined June 2019, went to Bids AGM, ramping based on speaking to a US tech investor (Lily Jack anyone?), latches onto a single area (2018 £300k test spend), holds tidbits of insider info. Care to explain your theory on lack of revenues last year? Hearing rumors... from who?
This is becoming a joke now.
We all know the game after the brokers note and the plan is being executed...
- Build DAUs
Fill DAUs with ads when we reach economies scale for the rather large agency groups.
Today is step 1 of that narrative being enacted.
We have retained two games and gained another.
Correct Yatak.
Some of these posters thought Codemasters would pull out.
What a huge seal of approval. Low revenues and still giving Bidstack more inventory rather than going to a competitor.
It’s called relationship building - these fogeys don’t know how to do it.
Lol - you’re over 70 aren’t you?
Locked away in your room for 12 weeks... tell you what - I’ll give you 7 days worth of posting. TheChancers. TheChancers. TheChancers. TheChancers. TheChancers. TheChancers. TheChancers.
As long as you post ****e all day you’ll get a further 7 days.
Doing my bit to entertain the elderly.
Okay - for clarity it's the people that don't understand facts which has created a narrative that https://bidlievers.com is only for a cult of LTHs.
In fact, we have 8 types of investors on the site - Bear, Bull, Wolf (manipulator I.e HELX,/SYNGE/JILSON/TheChancers), Pig (Impatient), Stag (Day Trader), Chicken (Fearful of the market i.e Niggle on ADVFN) and Ostrich (Peak your head in from time to time).
You sound like a novel stag-chicken virus based on your posting history.
Generally - people that don't venture over with their aliases are thrown into the untrustworthy bucket.
The majority of investors have moved away from ADVFN and LSE to hTTps://bidlievers.com
If you’ve stumbled across Bidstack for the first time I recommend starting there. Funnily enough... we are expecting far bigger things than F1 and the research is starting to look very positive towards some mammoth games publishers.
Intrepid - will be good to see you over there with your LSE alias now you've recommitted.
What comes before June TheChancers? Q2? You missed this one:
"While this challenge should not be under-estimated, we understand that Bidstack is in advanced stage negotiations for several titles with go-live planned for Q2-Q3 this year and additional titles are already being lined up for 2021. These games include a major title, which if signed, would considerably boost inventory, but should also provide a halo effect to the credibility of the new ad-format."
and this one
"Near term, our bigger focus is on games and daily active users (DAUs). Bidstack currently has around 100k DAUs live. Management is in the testing phase for titles, which it believes together could add 25-30m DAUs over the next two years. Games companies are very guarded with user data, but for context, the popular freemium titles Fortnite and PUBG are reported to have 20-30m DAUs each. A major paid-for title like EA’s FIFA attracts ~10m DAUs."
I didn't and I also mentioned cash raise.
#Balance @ https://bidlievers.com
https://bidlievers.com/viewtopic.php?p=1741#p1741
Told you we’d be the first to get it. Enjoy.
We discuss funding quite regularly TheChancers. You'd probably enjoy it. We're not blinkered - we can do maths - the portion of your equation which is somewhat lacking is the known-unknowns such as AAA games. The market is clearly struggling with that too...
What games could Bidstack be in to soften any funding blow? You'd get some decent ideas on https://Bidlievers.com
Really appreciate the testimonial Jilson. Might drop that on the website somewhere with your permission?
https://Bidlievers.com is open to guests of any persuasion. Another fact you've managed to get completely wrong. You really should sign up baby cakes - you'll learn a fact or two.
Harmony and understanding
Sympathy and trust abounding
No more falsehoods or derisions
Golden living dreams of visions
Mystic crystal revelation
And the mind's true liberation
Bidlievers
https://bidlievers.com
You wouldn't be wrong Mr Nation.
Gauge true sentiment over at https://Bidlievers.com and get your fill of fact based research to assist in your decision.
You'll only find nostalgic ex-BMX riders trying to think of the next best gag here whilst driving the likes of Intrepid to sell at the worst possible time.
‘Saturday debate funding’ - sounds like the shorting anonymous committee’s agenda item.
thechancers you read TW blog’s who said 5 weeks so you’ve discounted you original timeframe by half. That’s not how you should assess assumptions.
Mathematically Bidstack had 5 months from Jan after sensitising with a 20% increase in run rate costs and after discounting revenues 100%. So now you’ve read that on a bulletin board and because I’m far more qualified than TW why don’t you implement this into your fickle funding calculator? If needs be I can turn it into a blog post to make it seem that much more authoritative.
Can I also suggest Sunday’s Shorter Anonymous discussion be called ‘Sunday debate AAA games’?
Wouldn’t want an unbalanced LSE board would we? It tends to drive people away from any kind of discussion. Alternatively you could do what Jilson has done and pop by for a peek and a real debate on the hTTps://Bidlievers.com forum and post your note into either the funding thread or the bear vs bull thread. You’ll also have plenty of research to help you with your Sunday AAA game discussion.
Who knows? If you guys got there quick enough you’d have been able to ask James Draper harder hitting questions - there were 27 questions from 134 members after all - shame.
Morning mate, I'm going to bed now but we've all made peace here today. Hope you enjoy the interview. Let's all enjoy the breather.
Link below:
http://bit.ly/JDBidlieversInterview
We've been kind and not made it an 'exclusive'.
It is not a policy.
It is a rule.
"An entity is acting as a principal when it has exposure to the significant risks and rewards associated with the sale of goods or the rendering of services. Features that indicate that an entity is acting as a principal include:
(a)the entity has the primary responsibility for providing the goods or services to the customer or for fulfilling the order, for example by being responsible for the acceptability of the products or services ordered or purchased by the customer; - TICK - Bidstack is doing the leg work
(b)the entity has inventory risk before or after the customer order, during shipping or on return; TICK although the nature of the service makes this low risk.
(c)the entity has latitude in establishing prices, either directly or indirectly, for example by providing additional goods or services; and BIG TICK - Bidstack sets the prices of the inventory not the games developer.
(d)the entity bears the customer’s credit risk for the amount receivable from the customer. TICK - the receivables balance sits on Bidstack's balance sheet."
Advery Gross margin is 23%.... the revenue recognition is the same because it's required by revenue recognition rules! It' s not some BS that Bidstack has made up. Go and speak to the accounting bodies. Note, Adverty gross margins are 2 pips lower than Bidstack's interim GM %.
Google translate RÅVAROR OCH FORNODENHETER to get your COGS.
Come on Amirich just admit that your original de-ramp has backfired and made you look silly. If you were using that to de-ramp, maybe you should turn it on it's head to ramp Bidstack.. that would be fair wouldn't it?