One point (I guess some might have missed) is that BUR's US listing addresses one of the points raised in Carlton Blocks (aka Muddy Waters) interview of 'why is BUR still listed on AIM'
Sanibel, I wouldn't say it's quite finished MW released a report on the 11th of May, saying they were still not happy ....can read here https://www.muddywatersresearch.com/research/
My personal opinion is it might not be a good idea for Burford to take Muddy waters to court, simply because Burford would have to justify how they have presented their accounts in the past (could be very messy), I would personally hope Burford and Muddy Waters can settle out of court something that satisfies both parties before the next set of accounts in August ... but who knows for sure what will happen next!
PS today was about BUR vs LSE .... nothing really to do with Muddy Waters (or maybe indirectly it was)
If I may add a little to thomasbrowne's comment of "Whoever it was selling, I'm sure they know there would be a investigation into share sales ,and would know to cover there tracks," It appears Burford are currently trying to get LSE to release the names behind the alleged attack via the courts.... the current state of affairs has been published on the Burford's web site
I also guess their final results are overdue or not (a summary of year results was issued on the 7th of June) ... or will will the results be published on the 12 October, according to https://beta.companieshouse.gov.uk/company/09786498 that's the date!