RE: Linn U-turn11 Oct 2021 13:28
You and TheS*t do not know company law regarding "insider trading" as you think Linn has to tell you if he has raised the money.
Disclosure is necessary if a "fact" is withheld. But Linn has told you about the finance when he said:
"The results of this strategic review, encompassing both Providence’s Technical Strategy and it’s
related Financial Strategy, will be completed in Q4 2021 and will determine the strategic plan for the development of the Barryroe Field."
As he points out you will hear about the "Financial Strategy". Why not tell us now?
Well, have you ever asked the bank for a loan? In the past, before the Celtic Tiger days, I asked an Irish bank to lend me €1m to set up a business opportunity and they agreed. But in the meantime, before taking it up I came across another business opportunity where I did not need the loan so I went with that instead of takaing a loan at say 5% above Libor, but if I had wanted the money I could have had it.
Like Linn, it is called "A fall back position". There are so many ways to skin this Barryroe cat that he has a number of financial irons in the fire but with a certain backstop.
So, get real. For example, how much will it take to develop Barryroe over a phased development, $60m, $80M, $100m,$200m?
How much will Providence have to put up if they bring in a partners? Look at the partners in the past, Esso, Shell, etc. who have put up $m on defunct developments.
What about Schlumberger taking a share? They owe Providence $m for the fiasco they created in Druid/Drombeg which lost Providence a fortune. Note:
"The provisional location for a vertical well to test the two stacked prospects lies in c. 2,250 m water depth. The latest internal cost estimate for a dual objective Druid/Drombeg well is c. $85 million compared with the nearby c. $200 million Dunquin North exploration well, which was drilled to a similar depth in 2013."
So, in Dunquin North, they previously spent $200m and In Druid/Drombeg they spent another $42.5m as they brought in a partner who also lost another $42.5m.
That fiasco, created by Schlumberger, cost $85m. Would that have developed Barryroe? You bet.
And what about the financing of Lansdowne's 20%? How is that going to be funded? Do Lansdowne sell out? It is clear that you gob****es haven't considered that. If the cost of developing Barryroe is say $200m over the next, say three years, where is Lansdowne getting its money which will run to $40m? Will they be able to pay for it out the oil and gas revenues?
Has Lansdowne said how it is going to finance its share? NO! So how is it going to do it?
So, stop talking rubbish and wait for the "Financial Strategy" which is far more complex than either you two duffers realise.
That, surely, why they have declared a Financial Strategy which will be revealed in Q4 and which you clods have clearly either misunderstood or are just too stupid to realise it is a major issue made up