Member Info for MadDogMc

Also no mention of the yacht ? Weird …

“They are held accountable “.. As they should be . They should report the clients timelines filtered through the recent history of non delivery. Finally they seem to be doing that. Next up are the signatures followed by explanations for the delays . We deserve to know this

“Not even loose timelines “ Maybe they read my posts last week? lol!! Outwardly I’m thinking , ok we already knew this let’s see what the IMC throws up , inwardly I’m screaming “where the f*** is the final marine signature ??!!!!”

@SemaphorRed: I want what we all want which is commercialisation. That’s the only thing that will put the share price where we need it to be . I think that because we came so close with the first part of the tripartite last winter it would be good to complete that and get that trial going . It’s a big prestige trophy and will put us on the map globally .

Sparkle has good prospects and I hope that they both happen . But psychologically I want MsC across the line .

Stockcheque , I’d love it if “any day” were true but past few years have taught me that if in 6 months we are stuck in the same position regarding those three developments, that wouldn’t surprise me . Today’s RNS is positive . MSC is the one I’m waiting for . That’s the one I check for the red dot every morning.

Preparation H : isn’t that why they trialled at a smaller non baseload station so as not to interrupt actual power supply and still get the data ?

Displeasure must be voiced . That’s about all anyone can do . Or sell up . But that would be rash .

Stockcheque’s comments whether directed me or not don’t bother me in the slightest. My only hope is that a broad range of people including him emphasise to the board that we can’t go on like this . Hope followed by silence .

If that was you and others Vince , continually coming on and moaning in the most negative terms , perhaps even accusing the board of dishonesty or greed or indifference then yes I attacked that because it was poisoning this board. After the bump last year you admitted you were wrong to do so and apologised ? Am I right ? Perhaps that wasn’t you I can’t remember. If it was you , then I was right to attack your posts. I’m not attacking the board in a negative complaining fashion. I’m asking for change once we get the signatures which I’m still confident we will get. I want them to tell us why the delays happened . It might be an ugly truth they dare not divulge ie we are low on the to do list for MSC ,but we need to know . This last year’s delay is especially disappointing given how the year started.

Ah Stockcheque . You really are like a cult member who wants to cast out non believers. The idea that anyone buys or sells shares based on what people say on here is ludicrous. I am optimistic about this company but also worried that any gain we get is then lost waiting for aeons for actual progress without detailed explanations. I think that this is owed to all of us and any responsible shareholder would want to know the same . I mean is anyone else salivating at the thought of a share price jump upon the tripartite signature , followed by timeline promises that slip by silently during a year of silence ? Ie a repeat of 2025 ? No. Didn’t think so . Had anyone written and predicted what 2025 would look like last Xmas , Stockcheque would have had them cast out and told them they were talking their own book .The new CEO must provide concrete answers about the delays and we all must demand it.

Stockcheque. This isn’t bitcoin. The company has a duty to provide accurate information when it comes to timelines they have failed miserably . You seem adept at stating the obvious but when it comes to “belief “ then I need evidence to base that belief on . Otherwise it’s blind faith and a shot in the dark and who but a fool would make continued investments in such a project.? The time for excuses is past. Therefore , the company must explain the reasons for these delays so we can decide to remain or to sell up and move on to other stocks. If they cannot reasonably explain these delays better than they have previously then we are left with no other conclusion than we are a very low priority for the companies we are supposedly in league with . There is a chance that we will be no further forward a year from now .Blind faith won’t change that . Pressure on the board to explain themselves will at least give an informed reason to exit or stay ok for those of us who decide to do so .

Stockcheque , I’m aware that the contracts are progressing until we are told otherwise . That’s obvious. What the big problem is the wholly ludicrous timelines that we are promised for that progress to happen within. That’s what drives my decisions on what and when to invest. There is no reason to believe any schedule announcements from Quadrise anymore. We need to know if we are a low priority for these big companies . That’s what the delays are telling us I think . If we aren’t a low priority then we need more specific reasons for the delays. Otherwise how can we trust their announcements ? Like this one: “ Upon signature, installation and commissioning of the Company's trial equipment at the MAC² terminal is planned in Q4 2024, ahead of fuel production and the Proof-of-Concept tests commencing in early Q1 2025.”

If that’s the case then the timelines they give have no credibility without an explanation for the delays. Therefore how can anyone make a decision on further investment ? It’s another layer of uncertainty in a very uncertain AIM environment.

I’m feeling positive and I think most of us are on here. Should the MSC and Cargill deal not get signed by the AGM then the BOD have some very serious questions to answer about the timelines they give out. There is no evidence that it will happen before then but I am seriously hoping I’m wrong . Q4 is 5 working days away. They cannot give any credible timelines for next year in reality because clearly they have no control over their clients . They should be honest about this . Even if the signatures happen before the AGM then I think we all then deserve an explanation for the delays. Not just “lawyers” or “priorities “ but a detailed explanation before we all decide to buy more shares or contribute to a fundraiser in 2026. This information black hole is understandable whilst we wait but after the fact we will deserve complete transparency.Because if a contract for a trial takes this long then god knows how long for the commercial agreement , binding or not . The years are ticking by and I’m sore like you we are thinking where else our money could have been used. There is still great risk with this company . They need to reassure and inform us why this all takes so long .

AI is often total nonsense . I did an experiment on chat got using supposedly “failsafe prompts” for “excellent results” on a certain topic . What’s spat out was absolute nonsense then was desperate for feedback so it could learn . Forget AI for now and do the actual trawling through actual records for real accuracy.

Yes!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!!

Good work getting a CEO now let’s get those signatures and the share price in permanent double figure !!!

Good work getting a CEO now let’s get those signatures and the share price in permanent double figure !!!

Lol. The market just opened 45 minutes ago.

Surely you need an agreement with them to ensure consistency of supply over a given period otherwise they could pull out at any time for reasons beyond our control ? We want to lock them in surely ?